Why do you say that this is an extreme picture? The belt is riding in, essentially, the correct position.
To be honest, I don't see how one is easier to adjust than the other? A strobe is required for the first, but at least it directly adjusts the speed (by adjusting the effective diameter that the belt sees).
No, there is no inherent disadvantage to a crowned drive pulley.
Both the drive pulleys you show are effectively the same thing, crowned pulleys. The only difference is that the first allows the profile of the crown to be altered by tilting the vertical axis of the motor relative to the plane of the belt. The second assumes that this mechanical adjustment will be made electrically. Neither pulley solution is better, or worse, than the other in mechanical terms as both achieve belt centring my the same method, and a crowned pulley is the best solution.
However, if everything is accurately machined to a sufficiently high tolerance and the belt produced similarly, belt wander should not be an issue even on a straight sided pulley (unfortunately this is not always true, even for many 'quality' turntables).





Originally Posted by AlfaGTV


Reply With Quote
