
Originally Posted by
User211
My experience with the earlier KSA50 (not the 50S Martin has) is that it was dire WITHOUT a coloured sounding ARC LS26 from the US!!!
And I do think the LS26 was coloured in a way the KSA50 totally needed. That particular ARC threw huge 3D soundstage and some very nice tonality in the mids. I don't think all ARC preamps are coloured to that extent, BTW.
However, a KSA300 with an Krell pre and DAC I heard later sounded very good, really, on both Apogees and some Usher Dancer variant. I was surprised.
Jerry tried the LS26 on his MBLs and hated it. I don't think it'd work well in that situ at all. Its huge soundstage would just lack any focus with a pair of omnis which disperse sound all over the place by default.
No matter, Martin has enough experience to find what he wants sooner or later. Almost. I say almost because none of us ever really do find exactly what we want, in truth.
Can I carry on without appearing to challenge? (I know it's difficult for me to do this and apologies if I do).
Wide and huge soundstages can be an artefact added in with some products in my experience. I think many exalted moving coil cartridges do this, adding a sort of 'halo' around the music which our ears love to hear but which isn't really there in the rather dryer sounding masters in my experience. Maybe added compression in the vinyl cutting stage does this, I don't know... The previous KSA50 is a very different amp to the one Martin has from memory, the only remote similarities being the power, approximate case size, the weight (hope he kept the box I bought for it as it was bloody expensive...) and the model number. The innards and sound are very different in the two generations I think, the old one sounding a bit grey and cloudy in comparison and not as taut in the bass. Later FPB's sounded almost Quad like when new I thought, with a velvet quality but ABSOLUTELY HUGE control and power in the bass. I have huge fondness for an FPB300 we had for dem for a short while, that amp was so good, all but ignoring the speakers connected to it and just opening out (or closing up) depending on what went in...
The one thing my recent few years exposure to a slightly different viewpoint has confirmed for me, is to keep the signal path as simple as reasonably possible and if you have to add electronics to the signal path, I still recommend making sure that no added colour or character is added in. It's my experience and opinion that preamps were the scourge of the earth, certainly in the 80's when so many of them audibly altered what went in to them.
I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?