Location: Coventry, England UK
Posts: 532
I'm Simon.
Any benefit of using just the reclocker board into my Arcam DAC (which is currently running straight from a RPi 2 via Coax)?
Location: France
Posts: 147
I'm allo.
True, no SPDIF out on the RPI2.
Ultrafide U500DC power amplifier - Croft Vitale )highly modified) - TRIO L-07D Turntable - Denon DL103C1 - Funk Firm Houdini - Lentek MC head amp - 15" Tannoy Monitor Gold Loudspeakers in Lockwood Major cabinets (From Trident Studios) - Tannoyista SPEC 3 Custom Crossovers - VanDamme Black Speaker Cable
Tannoyista.com - Audio Equipment Reviews
Location: Coventry, England UK
Posts: 532
I'm Simon.
Location: Coventry, England UK
Posts: 532
I'm Simon.
Location: Leeds
Posts: 164
I'm Dave.
See also post #91.
Good moaning, I have had my 'Allo 'Allo DAC running for a couple of days now.
Why buy it?
I have been running a Pi2 + IQAudio DAC+ for the last year or so and have been optimising the 5V supply for it over the last few weeks. A bit of research and some pcb tracing shows that the supply arrangements are: 5V from the Pi is fed to an on board LDO which supplies 3V3 to the analogue side of the DAC, the Pi's 3V3 supply (from a switching reg) supplies the digital side of the DAC. Comments on DIYAudio claim the IQ DAC+ has some design deficiencies. I am not sure if this is what they mean. In comparison the Piano 2.1 DAC has separate on board LDOs for the digital and analogue supply pins and it gets its feed from the KALI, so avoids the switching reg in the Pi.
In addition there is the well known problem of the Pi clock not being a multiple of 44.1Khz so they need to do some manipulation of the clock to get near to the right frequency. The KALI sorts this and also removes the alleged high levels of jitter on the I2S output.
Conclusion: lower jitter and better supplies ough to provide much better sound and all the review seem to back this up.
Listening session 1:
Swapped the IQ DAC+ for the Piano 2.1. PS still fed from the Pi2 and still using Moode 2.3 (yes, I know it's over a year old). The Piano worked exactly the same and no settings needed to be changed (hardware vol and Low latency IIR with de-emphasis filter).
Initial impression, with low level listening, was of a bit more detail and control over the DAC+.
I left is playing for several hours and then listened again. Same impression.
Listening session 2:
As everyone else was out I was able to enjoy some more enthusiastic replay levels :-)
1st off tried the Piano without the KALI. Similar impression to the 1st session but also noticed a lack of dynamics and a somewhat flat and narrow soundstage compared to what I was used to with the DAC+. Had a good blast for 1/2 an hour then decided it was time for the "gamechanger".
With great expectation I fired up the Pi2/KALI/Piano2.1 stack, powered via the KALI from the same external 5V supply.
Initial impression was that is was a bit cleaner and tidier sounding than without the KALI. BUT... the same lack of dynamics and feeble soundstage remained.
I then went back to Pi2 & DAC+. Better is every way! The music is back in my living room!
The simple fact is that the IQAudio DAC just makes me want to listen louder and longer, and to a wider range of music.
Officer Crabtree: [climbing out of the rubble] There is obviously no piss for the wicked.![]()
Last edited by Starterman; 14-11-2016 at 12:01.
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 647
I'm andrew.
Nice honest review Dave.
Andy.