+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 28 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 276

Thread: Marco's cleaning process with new vinyl, using an RCM

  1. #91
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,031
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Yes, But that's not what I'm talking about, I mean brushes used before playing a record.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  2. #92
    Join Date: Nov 2013

    Location: N London

    Posts: 630
    I'm Steven.

    Default

    For the uninitiated. An excellent video from Mark Baker.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUbC2ANXRqY

    Yes, he uses L'Art Du Son, but he doesn't have mushrooms growing off his records.
    Wilson Sabrina, Gryphon Diablo 300, Innuos Pulsar, Aqua Formula DAC, Garrard 301 CTC, Mofi Master Phono, Puritan 156, NeoTech and Atlas cables.

  3. #93
    Join Date: Nov 2013

    Location: N London

    Posts: 630
    I'm Steven.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaym481 View Post
    It was always my understanding the the fluid did the work. The brush is just to make sure it gets into the grooves.
    The brush does not go in the grooves, nor does it have to or should it. See video just posted.
    Wilson Sabrina, Gryphon Diablo 300, Innuos Pulsar, Aqua Formula DAC, Garrard 301 CTC, Mofi Master Phono, Puritan 156, NeoTech and Atlas cables.

  4. #94
    Join Date: Jun 2012

    Location: glasgow

    Posts: 1,507
    I'm scott.

    Default

    Brushes are so 20th century Welcome to the 21st century


  5. #95
    Join Date: Dec 2011

    Location: Far Away

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Gone.

    Default

    Interesting video Scott, factually it leaves a little to be desired however. To start at the end of the process, there is little better than cold air, unless it has been negatively ionised for promoting static, you might have seen desert lightning and the like. Secondly, I don't think there is any suggestion that the idea is for the brush to reach to the bottom of the groove. The idea is to get the fluid into the top of the groove and spread it evenly. Capillary action combined with the correct wetting agent will carry and indeed force the fluid to the bottom of the grooves, in fact research has shown that the absorbent dry nature of a lot of the dust particles will mean that fluid, with the correct degree and type of wetting agent will easily travel throughout the groove. Likewise to go back to the question of static, a properly designed fluid will be anti static and will not build up static on the record.

    Here are some microscope pics of the same record before and after cleaning with a Loricraft machine

    Before


    After


    These were made independently of either Loricraft or myself and the whole video is on the net. I doubt it is possible for any RCM to do better than this.

    Also, there is some discussion as to the effect of ultrasonic bombardment on vinyl with some thinking that molecules must be stripped away by the process. I have seen no published data to the contrary. On the other hand we can show that using "The Right One" fluid after 100 cleaning cycles on a Loricraft PRC4 there were no deleterious effects and after 1000 wetting and drying cycles to a strip of recording vinyl there was no de-vinylising.

    Yes brushes are indeed 20th century and so are quality vintage HiFi, the LP record, and the electric guitar all things that make music great.

    Cheers

  6. #96
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    Trade members touting their wares should be in the "trade section" so visit it guys, nice one!

  7. #97
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    WTF who is this?


  8. #98
    Join Date: Dec 2011

    Location: Far Away

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Gone.

    Default

    I'm not touting for business David I'm just refuting a statement made about one technology touted by someone who appears to have an axe to grind, in my opinion brushes and vacuums rule That's my profile pic mate, bit out of date as I've now lost three and a half stone. My listeners haven't complained though in fact I have been asked for a signed print..... Or was that a signed cheque

  9. #99
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulStewart View Post
    I'm not touting for business David I'm just refuting a statement made about one technology touted by someone who appears to have an axe to grind, in my opinion brushes and vacuums rule That's my profile pic mate, bit out of date as I've now lost three and a half stone. My listeners haven't complained though in fact I have been asked for a signed print..... Or was that a signed cheque
    Wasn't meaning you chief! I rarely visit the AOS these days as hounded off for being over enthusiastic which was ill perceived as pushy salesmanship!

  10. #100
    Join Date: Dec 2011

    Location: Far Away

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Gone.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mains Cables R Us View Post
    Wasn't meaning you chief! I rarely visit the AOS these days as hounded off for being over enthusiastic which was ill perceived as pushy salesmanship!
    Ahh! that's why you didn't answer the PM I sent you I'm turning Safari off now as I have a show to record on this Mac

    Cheers

+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 28 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •