Can't we have proper cartridge testing too - i.e. frequency response, distortion and tracking ability too - ?
I only ask this as opinions are one thing, but there ought to be some sort of reference involved if original masters aren't available to hear how the decks and cartridges differ from them. This isn't to do the Denons down (far from it - quite the opposite I reckon, looking at various HFC reviews in which they measured rather well), but some of the Lyra's, for example, take off and super-sonic nasties can help to overload phono stages prematurely, whereas a SUT may help to damp it a bit perhaps (several subjects covered here, but there's a reason for everything and none of it is magic IMO).
The DL103 seems to like a very massy arm. What happens at the arm/cart resonance point when a Jelco is used as, say, a Rega RB series. How does the SMEV (or even an M3cope when compared to the Jelco???
Sorry to be all objective, but I think these areas should be covered as well.
P.S. Interesting about LP12 fanboi opinion. I never once heard Ivor slagging off the Technics direct-drive principle. Had the LP12 not been derived so heavily from the TD150 implentation of The AR ideas, it may well have been direct drive according to Ivor
I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?