Quote Originally Posted by Figlet108 View Post
Gordon, I'm confused, I don't post on PFM, or did you mean something else?

Also, if you want to interpret my 3 original posts on here about the cable as posting with a hidden agenda to get back at RD that's fine, you are entitled to your view. Others hopefully will see it for what it was: a pros and cons view based on experience.

As for getting back at RD, there is nothing I can say to damage RD and NVA more than he does himself with many of his posts on HFS and how he sometimes treats customers. I have no interest at getting back at RD as it's a childish waste of life and utterly pointless . However, I do have an interest in clearing my name of the lies and libel that has been spread by him that insights people that don't know me or what has actually happened to hate me and publicly insult me.

What do you think Gordon? Do I have a right to clear my name and answer to accusations? Does RD have a right to post publicly whatever he wants regardless of truth and validity without right of reply? How would you feel?

After RD himself dragged our break up into the public domain I have said that I have nothing to hide and will gladly answer to any accusations and take responsibility for my actions and words. Twice I have tried to do that on HFS, which I believe is the appropriate place so as not to torture any other innocent forums. Both times I have had my defense and myself removed, despite sticking to RD's own rules on posting, and history is re-written according to Dunne.
Please find anything of my defense anywhere on the internet and show it to me. It doesn't exist. It's been deleted.

Believe it or not Gordon, reading lies and hate about myself on a public forum is very upsetting to me. Maybe others are more robust, but we have all had different childhood experiences that have shaped our adulthood, and in my case I don't have a thick skin
I'm sorry, it could have been the Wigwam, my memory for that may be faulty but not for the event. You say any evidence has been deleted?? Then it would be difficult to prove wouldn't it?

My interest here right or wrong, was to point out that there was a conflict of interest. Anything you say about NVA products has to be filtered through the knowledge that you were once involved
with the company and have fallen out with Richard Dunn. Whether you like it or not, admit it or not there is bound to be some suspicion that you have ulterior motives. You would do better to do what I would have suggested and walked away totally, in no way trying to get back at Richard Dunn for whatever reason and certainly not raising the possibility of accusations like those you have here by criticising his products in such a way. People who are unaware of your problems with NVA would not be able to make a rational decision and would in fact, be in danger of being misled.

Your thin skin I can do nothing about I'm afraid, we all take responsibilities for our own actions and if we find ourselves under pressure, its tough but something we just have to cope with.