+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 412131415 LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 144

Thread: Mains Cables R Us linear PSU for SB-Touch: A+

  1. #131
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Just on its own - I don't need the toolbox and I've disabled any applets I don't need.

  2. #132
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Great Harwood, Lancashire

    Posts: 84
    I'm Russell.

    Default

    I haven't got it loaded either, but I am coming to a conclusion here...

    It pains me to say this but I think that my crappy LG DNX190UH DVD/CD player feeding my Bushmaster optically sounds better than the Squeezebox Touch,

    The Squeezebox has the updated Mains Cables R Us LDP power supply for DC needs and then it is connected to the Bushmaster using one of Mike's bespoke coaxial leads (the new version).

    The CD option is just a whole lot easier to listen to in my opinion, there is just something that gets on my nerves audio wise with the Touch and prevents me relaxing to the music.

    Thing is...

    Almost all of my music is now in FLAC format, I still have CD's but not hardly what you would call a "collection".

    I will do some comparing tests and come to some conclusions on this.
    Squeezebox Touch -> Beresford Bushmaster DAC -> Leema Pulse Amplifier -> Celestion SL6S

    http://www.definedlight.com

  3. #133
    Join Date: Jun 2009

    Location: S-ex

    Posts: 523
    I'm Steve.

    Default

    Russell, it pains me reading that

    Can you try throwing the bits out of the Touch optically rather than SPDif?

    Edit: I have Mike Coax also, I love it, the optical is less detailed but an easier ride.
    Steve & Valerie

    www.electricbeachaudio.com

    If you think you know the answer already, you're not really searching

    A plastic box, some glass bottles, two metal tins and some lengths of string

  4. #134
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russell Turner View Post
    It pains me to say this but I think that my crappy LG DNX190UH DVD/CD player feeding my Bushmaster optically sounds better than the Squeezebox Touch
    Hi Russell

    I thought I'd test that comparison myself. I extracted a couple of WAV files from favourite CDs and compared the two via my Bushmaster. The CD was put in my Pioneer Blu-ray player used as a trasport, via optical (Kimber) to the BM. The WAV was streamed from my PC to the Touch, then to the BM via co-ax (Chord ProDAC Silver).

    They both sounded good and I went back and forth between them without being able to tell any difference. Both Bushmaster and Touch are powered from Paul Hynes power supplies and the latter has the EDO applet. I would have to say, based on this experience, that there's very little in it and the BM is doing a great job of reclocking the data so that source becomes immaterial.
    Last edited by MartinT; 02-07-2012 at 20:18. Reason: Added cables used

  5. #135
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Great Harwood, Lancashire

    Posts: 84
    I'm Russell.

    Default

    I did a similar exercise on Saturday...

    I think what the significant difference is, is that the Touch has a more "up-front" presentation to music reproduction, possibly slightly less soundstage than a CD source in this instance and this is reflected in the eventual fatigue I get.

    Put simply it's just too in your face, not in a massive way, but in my system it was notable, it wasn't a harsh sound it was just a more "here this is IT" kind of thing...

    Hard to convey I know but that is what my observation was.
    Squeezebox Touch -> Beresford Bushmaster DAC -> Leema Pulse Amplifier -> Celestion SL6S

    http://www.definedlight.com

  6. #136
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Yes, that's interesting. For me, there was no difference in presentation that I could detect. One thing occurs: are you using your Touch with wireless? I'm using cabled ethernet.

  7. #137
    Join Date: Jan 2012

    Location: Newcastle

    Posts: 196
    I'm Chris.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russell Turner View Post
    I did a similar exercise on Saturday...

    I think what the significant difference is, is that the Touch has a more "up-front" presentation to music reproduction, possibly slightly less soundstage than a CD source in this instance and this is reflected in the eventual fatigue I get.

    Put simply it's just too in your face, not in a massive way, but in my system it was notable, it wasn't a harsh sound it was just a more "here this is IT" kind of thing...

    Hard to convey I know but that is what my observation was.
    Russell, are you using EDO? I compared buffer sizes yesterday and found that the small buffer size sounded more "in your face" than the large buffer size, brighter but with a bit more 'air'. In comparison, the large buffer size was smoother and you could focus more easily on the structure of the music. Small buffer size is my preference, so that's what I've left it as. Worth a try.

    Chris

  8. #138
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chops View Post
    Russell, are you using EDO? I compared buffer sizes yesterday and found that the small buffer size sounded more "in your face" than the large buffer size, brighter but with a bit more 'air'. In comparison, the large buffer size was smoother and you could focus more easily on the structure of the music. Small buffer size is my preference, so that's what I've left it as. Worth a try.

    Chris
    It's a computer really and someone once said to me computers like to be left alone, what a load of b...ox, the touch is a tweakers delight and the best mod I have ever heard was the digital output mod, the touch sounds like a 5k cd player now or better in fact! Keep tweaking guys and remember it's all about the music.

  9. #139
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Glasgowshire

    Posts: 10,639
    I'm Gary.

    Default

    Glad your liking your Touch Dave
    Sounding good with the MDac?
    Letting go and relaxing
    is the most ‘in control’ thing you can do

  10. #140
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gazjam View Post
    Glad your liking your Touch Dave
    Sounding good with the MDac?
    I can honestly say that Muddy Waters was in my room, the combination of Canor Tube Amp and SB/M-DAC is truly stunning. When I get some spare time I will download my quota of 24 bit flac's off the B&W site as I have not been on for a while. The touch sounds better with a memory stick in the back than through my NAS drive too!

    Gaz thanks for doing the mods for me, you are a thoroughly decent chap!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 412131415 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •