+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 133 FirstFirst ... 412131415162464114 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 1328

Thread: Beresford Bushmaster DAC Reviews

  1. #131
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: Down South

    Posts: 2,411
    I'm Neal.

    Default

    First impressions:

    Build quality is a step up from the Caimen, I like the front panel and the sleep mode LED’s

    Streaming from a heavily modified Squeezebox with 16/44.1 the sound is very clean and detailed. There’s no harshness that I can detect, the balance is just right from top to bottom. Bass is very good, it’s a very engaging DAC to listen to, tone is spot on.

    Compared to my modified passive Caimen it brings detail to the fore that the Caimen sort of masks…its there but just not that well defined. The Caimen is a little lean in comparison and doesn’t have the same bounce or drive as the Bushmaster. On some tracks the difference can be quite small but the Bushmaster is never second best.

    Not noticed any burn in change, its as good 30hrs later as it was 20mins in…its very good Stan well done….

    One question: I take it the Caimen PSU is compatible with the Bushmaster @15v? I might try it later…
    Listening in a Foo free Zone...

    Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

  2. #132
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubberdog View Post
    If the polling of the inputs is controlled via software, rather than looking it as a single case for my self....would it be possible to tweak the software?
    I am not the greatest and quickest coder in the world so don't expect a speedy modified code solution. It took me two years just to get the basic Bushmaster code written.

    Quote Originally Posted by loonytunes View Post
    Sometimes I wonder if all this async USB stuff is nonsense - I am no engineer - but ultimately the ears do tell..
    I have been saying that for some time now, but some people have accused me of playing spoil sport. So I have given up trying to get them to understand that the science behind async USB doesn't add up. Lousy designers have been blaming SMPS, adaptive USB, etc for all sorts of failings, when in fact it is the designer who is coming up short. If you look at all the outrageous claims I made about the Bushmaster and its performance many people considered it to be pure BS and sales hype or impossible to achieve without spending a fortune on a DAC. I genuinely feel sorry for the poor punter who has nothing else to go by than a big price tag. I did say the Bushmaster will set a new standard of expectation for any potential DAC buyer, and I am glad to see that it does.

    Quote Originally Posted by NRG View Post
    One question: I take it the Caimen PSU is compatible with the Bushmaster @15v? I might try it later…
    The pug is different, but Mark Grant mentioned that he is selling an adapter plug.

  3. #133
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russell Turner View Post
    Nope definitely 24bit 88.2KHz FLAC files ripped directly from the SACD two channel layer
    So you can extract the DSD stream from the hi-res layer of SACDs and convert them to PCM? Cool - what software do you use?

  4. #134
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Great Harwood, Lancashire

    Posts: 84
    I'm Russell.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinT View Post
    So you can extract the DSD stream from the hi-res layer of SACDs and convert them to PCM? Cool - what software do you use?
    DVDAexplorer

    And I didn't do it.

    :-)
    Squeezebox Touch -> Beresford Bushmaster DAC -> Leema Pulse Amplifier -> Celestion SL6S

    http://www.definedlight.com

  5. #135
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russell Turner View Post
    DVDAexplorer
    Thanks, checking it out now.

  6. #136
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Sheffield

    Posts: 2,025
    I'm Confused.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I am not the greatest and quickest coder in the world so don't expect a speedy modified code solution. It took me two years just to get the basic Bushmaster code written.
    Stan,
    Just a thought: -
    Given the amount of help and advice that was forthcoming from the forum on the design of the front panel, is there anyone you could trust with the software code on here to help you with modding that also? Any volunteers?
    Dave.
    DaveK.

    My System:
    Power: Belkin PF40, Custom.hifi.cables Hydra and DC PSUs.
    Sources: Self built HTPC with Xonar ST sound card, NAD T585 multi disc player, Sony BDP-S350, Squeezebox Touch, Techncs SL1210 (mod'd) + Nagaoka MP30, Thomson Sky HD box.
    Amps etc.: 2 x Mini-T amps, MF-X10D Valve buffer clone, StanDAC 7520/Caiman (mod'd).
    Speakers: Mission 774s with added super tweeters
    Cables: best I can afford and likely to change except Homar's RF attenuated co-ax's and Mark Grant USB and HDMI cables. I also like silver i/cs and speaker cable.

  7. #137
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveK View Post
    Given the amount of help and advice that was forthcoming from the forum on the design of the front panel, is there anyone you could trust with the software code on here to help you with modding that also?
    Nope.

  8. #138
    Join Date: Aug 2008

    Location: London

    Posts: 2,410
    I'm Nat-andthat'swhyIdrink.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jandl100 View Post
    Umm.

    That Level 4 Lampi-DAC I reviewed was a stunning sounding piece of kit.
    In my review I said it was the best digital I had heard up to then, and I would miss it when it was returned.

    Is Stan's little masterpiece as good?
    I would say it is different but in the same sonic league.

    There's a (valve-induced?) richness to the LampiDACs tonality that the Bushmaster doesn't (quite) attain.

    There's a depth to the 3D image that the Bushmaster doesn't quite reach into.

    The lateral imaging is just as good, though (i.e. superb) - in fact, I'd give the Bushmaster the nod on this.
    I find the lateral image thing quite difficult to describe - it's not just things laid out precisely left to right. There's a wholeness, a 3D integrity, to an orchestral violin section, say, that just makes it look/sound to be there in front of you as a real-seeming entity. Hmm - you have to hear this level of kit to understand what I am on about, I think! It just sounds real, you can literally see it in your mind's eye there in front of you, and you realise that other good sounding kit just doesn't approach this kind of realism once you've heard it.

    You can hear more clearly into the recording acoustic space with the Bushmaster. The only digital kit to rival the Bushmaster in this respect that I've heard are the Krell KPS-25c and Opera Droplet. The LampiDAC is good, very good, but still isn't quite as transparently revealing.

    The Lampi-bass is just a little slack, in comparison, it seems a bit less taut and tuneful and powerful than the Bushmaster.

    The Bushmaster locks onto rhythms better. It's just wonderful in this respect. I suspect it's the hear-thru transpency - the micro-detail that makes live music special is well portrayed by the Bushmaster - you can hear the subtle inflections of beat and pace that makes music come alive.

    The Bushmaster is better made and looks superior.

    The Level 4 Lampizator DAC that I was lucky enough to play with starts at 4,200 Euros, for the simplest I/O options.
    Stan's bag of tricks should set you back a bit less than that.
    Thanks for taking the time to write that Jerry! Very informative.

    And Stan says he has ideas for better 3D too for a super version..

    Hmm... I'm not one for buying new nor acting on a wave of other's enthusiasm but the Bushmaster is sounding very intreaging indeed.

  9. #139
    Join Date: Jan 2012

    Location: Norfolk

    Posts: 339
    I'm Chris.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I have been saying that for some time now, but some people have accused me of playing spoil sport. So I have given up trying to get them to understand that the science behind async USB doesn't add up...
    Yes Stan, and I am glad the simplicity of spdif can still be engineered to make digital sound at its very best. I had been toying around with async not helped by all the 'hype' and this Computer Audiophile YouTube video about Pocket Server v.2 from Chris Connaker...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iORZDo_Bh8

  10. #140
    Join Date: Feb 2011

    Location: Troon

    Posts: 2,439
    I'm tony.

    Default

    Just got mine....hooked it up.....Its very good without any reservations.
    First impressions are that it does low frequencies better than I have heard (rega dac/ mf m1/ CA dac magik/ a couple of chinese jobbies ). Great soundstage, detail and pace. Slight sibilance to the treble but its not even at room temperature yet.
    Report back once its had a couple of days to settle down....will give it a whirl in comparison with my m1 head amp with the hd 650s and various superluxes I have.
    A great machine Stan, well done.
    Regards Tony.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •