Closed Thread
Page 21 of 35 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 347

Thread: Why do you need a speaker crossover - discuss

  1. #201
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 111,021
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Lol - no worries. But if Andrew's only purpose of making that remark was to wind Richard up (yet again), then I'll have finally lost my patience.

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & regulator mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat with Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight. Isonoe feet & boots. Ortofon RS-212D tonearm with Denon DL-103GL in a Denon PCL-300 headshell, fitted with Funk Firm Houdini and Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp and Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp, fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.

  2. #202
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,034
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by technobear View Post
    Quite a few on DIYaudio have removed the dust cap and replaced it with a phase plug. It is said this reduces the beaming and improves them no end.
    Chris/Paul,
    Yes, I have put phase plugs in mine and it was indeed a good improvement. Just seems to smooth out and extend the top.end. I feel no need for a tweeter. I used Planet10 plugs.

    Paul,
    Regarding the use of two bass drivers, I did not design these baffles, but as I understand it, the use of the Eminence in an OB causes a -6db drop in level at bass frequencies. Using two drivers redresses this imbalance.

  3. #203
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Cricklewood

    Posts: 9,074
    I'm ILOB.

    Default

    Paul Ben Harper is not related to Roy
    His music is a mixiture of rock soul blues folk and reggae He has a voice is nearly as good as Jeff Buckley and a good guitar player too
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Harper
    Loves anything from Pain of Salvation to Jeff Buckley to Django to Sarasate to Surinder Sandhu to Shawn Lane to Nick Drake to Rush to Beth Hart to Kate Bush to Rodrigo Y Gabriela to The Hellecasters to Dark Sanctury to Ben Harper to Karicus to Dream Theater to Zero Hour to Al DiMeola to Larry Carlton to Derek Trucks to Govt Mule to?

    Humour: One of the few things worth taking seriously

  4. #204
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Hynes View Post
    I cannot photo the lines this week as we are re-decorating the lounge and making it more music friendly, however I have some photos of the line arrays I took at the old Cumbrian address that are on Photobucket at the following links :-

    http://i700.photobucket.com/albums/w...Picture036.jpg

    http://i700.photobucket.com/albums/w...Picture039.jpg

    and the power amp :-

    http://i700.photobucket.com/albums/w...lhynes/SE1.jpg
    Paul, the line arrays look very interesting and appeal to my sense of right-ness. However, it's the power amp that has me drawing breath in amazement. What a fantastically simple and elegant circuit. Clearly it's going to be very power supply dependent, but of course that is your game. What kind of output do you get from one of these and is the output impedance low enough?

  5. #205
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,034
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Those speakers look great Paul. Could you provide more info please? PM would be fine if you'd rather keep it more private.

  6. #206
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    How accurate is speaker reproduction anyhow?

  7. #207
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    How accurate is speaker reproduction anyhow?
    It depends on your reference. If you like classical or acoustic music, it's easy to compare. Anything electronic (jazz, rock etc.) and you're into a whole world of preferences and lack of baseline.

  8. #208
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,148
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    Hi All,
    ok, lets take this debate a little further and discuss what we are actualy doing when we use either cross-overs [be it mechanical or passive/electrical]
    What are the goals we wish to acheive, and what affect might this have on the performance of the speaker/driver and cabinet as a whole ?
    Anthony,TD...
    "Today scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality"
    Nikola Tesla



    Its now a conspiracy theory to believe that the Immune system is capable of doing the job it was designed to do.
    A fish is only as healthy as the water its swimming in ! [Dr Robert Young]


    www.tubedistinctions.co.uk

    Matthew 5:10

  9. #209
    Join Date: May 2011

    Location: Epping

    Posts: 716
    I'm Richard.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    Well, Richard, to be blunt (and you know I mean no offence), you do tend to rattle on sometimes about the 'same old, same old', in terms of your particular 'pet hates', often I think without even being aware you are doing it.....

    Therefore, I'd treat Alex's earlier gentle dig (his first post on the matter) as a polite reminder of that

    I don't think anyone here is "deaf". Like I said before, out with of personal tastes, context is the key. Perhaps if you'd heard some of the BBC loudspeaker designs in a different context, with different equipment, results would've been different? It's not an impossibility.

    Therefore, I think it would be an idea to keep that thought in your head, rather than simply write off ALL BBC-style loudspeakers as crap, because to do so would simply be absolutist and smack of simplistic thinking, and IMO, you have a much more inquisitive mind than that!

    Marco.
    I don't think I am doing any different to anyone else, expressing preferences and opinion. I listened to *all* the new speakers that appeared on the market during the early 70's when the BBC designs appeared, up to 1977 and they were all bland, undynamic and one trick ponies. Do you want me to lie to you to protect the sensitivities of some of your members! And ***IMO***!!! this was largely caused by over complex crossovers. After 1977 I was not listening on a regular basis apart from at shows or shops and what I heard just re-enforced my opinion. It was such a breath of fresh air by the mid 80's to walk into Bespoke Audio in Stockport and listen to some good US style speakers in the Allisons, to get away from either Linn speakers in some shops or BBC types in other shops. I was very much in the minority, but I probably always have and always will be.

    I do not have absolutism or simplistic thinking, I have experience and opinion, nothing more. It is not simplistic when I worked with the design and production team at AR UK, nor was it simplistic to know how those crossovers worked, how they influenced the sound and also designed for both personal use (in the early days), and for commercial use.

    How can you discuss crossovers and the influence they have without talking about the two expremes 1/ BBC design 2/ Crossoverless design, and most of the discussion has been about *OTHER* peoples crossoverless designs.

    I do not accept you argument - full stop! but I respect you opinion, it is mine that is not being respected. If I feel I am locked in a room and gagged with tabboo subjects all around me and I am not allowed to talk about them because I step on a few toes, then what is the point of posting. I may step on a few toes (I always have) but I don't go around stamping on some ones feet as is my fate from these people. Mine are due to my discussion and opinion *on topic* theirs are deliberate and personal attacks.

  10. #210
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,034
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    My take on it is it's a good idea to have a wide range driver to cover top and mid and mid bass perhaps, and use woofers to fill in the bottom end. This avoids crossing over where the ear is most sensitive, which a lot of commercial boxes do. Also, to my ears a full or wide range driver just sounds more real and coherent.

    Electrostatics have particular strengths in soundstaging, imaging and transient response for similar reasons, given that they are ostensibly a full range single driver with extremely light mass. Like anything else they are not perfect, but what they do well they do better than anything else.

Closed Thread
Page 21 of 35 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •