Life long music lover and Hi-Fi enthusiast for over 40 years, avid live music supporter, dismayed by the current dynamic ticket pricing applied to so many events !!
Letting it do its own calibration rarely works out well. What the mic 'hears' isn't what we hear, at least above the transition point. Like using a flamethrower to take the top off a pint of milk.
On the subject of plants I took a big one out of a corner, was surprised to discover how much damping of flutter echo it had been doing.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,295
I'm James.
I heard the effect of a DSP system at a mates house and it was horrible. The loss of bass from his speakers was dramatic. I would prefer too much bass rather than too little.
I think the best room correction is application and implementation of room acoustic material rather than digital processing.
I use a combination of the two, but I only apply a very small amount of DSP over a very narrow bandwidth.
Sounds to me like your mate was not doing it properly. This business of using some crappy mic supplied with the unit, sticking it roughly in the listening position, and then letting the computer do all the calibration is unlikely to give the best results. Of course it's quick and easy and so seems like a good idea.
At best it gives a starting point but then you have to go old school and tweak by ear.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,295
I'm James.
Yes, I imagine the way to go would be for the DSP to give you a 'flat' response, then you adjust from there to suit your tastes. I've heard a variety of set ups employing DSP and always been impressed. I bet most people would find 'flat' deathly boring, but the means to cut this, boost that incrementally appeals to me.
I'd be using it myself, just as soon as I can
(a) buy what's needed
(b) find someone with the time, knowledge and patience to help me set it up![]()
I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in
T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
Speakers: KEF Reference 3, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables
T'other system:
Echo Dot, Arcam A75 integrated, Monitor Audio R852 MD speakers
A/V:
LG OLED65 G56LS, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL T9i sub.
KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009
Flat response in room usually sounds way too toppy.
But if you have a room node at say 80Hz and your speakers have a port that is tuned to 80hz - boom, boom shake the room. With DSP you can cut at 80Hz and leave the rest untouched, solving the problem.
There's really no way to do that with passive treatment and analogue EQ is too crude.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.
DSP...
I'll go with analogue over digital and stick with the plants!
Just one more thing to faff about with and get in the way of enjoying the music.
Had similar issues to what’s been reported when I tried it in my own room, so not for me.
Luckily, no big speaker/room problems to dial out here.
Last edited by Gazjam; 28-07-2024 at 16:03.
Ok with not having it on Betamax nowadays
Yup,
The big Meridian just sits there quietly, doing its thing Adrian.
Hardly even gets warm at picture rattling volumes, mega redundancy, it’s a good power amp.
I biwire with it, and a recent swap out to Duelund 10 gauge cable for the bass, from 16 gauge helped it step up a notch, impedance down I guess with beefier cable.
Sounds more “fruity” and less dry as a pal recently said.
(The Science bit plays this out)
Last edited by Gazjam; 28-07-2024 at 16:19.
Ok with not having it on Betamax nowadays