Originally Posted by
Marco
Texaco were probably keeping an eye on Shell's already-established 99 fuel to see how it sells, and decided it's worth it. Are there any figures published on performance gains? I could be tempted to stick some in the Volvo...
But my question is whether the performance gains are actually worth the higher price I assume it commands? I recently went over to Shell V-Power (which I assume is the same kind of thing) in order to get E5 fuel into the 'Blade rather than bog-basic (E10) unleaded. And I can't discern a difference to be honest. Mind you the bike is stupidly quick anyway (for an old 'un)
I could try the Texaco version next time, but I suspect all the 99 octane fuels will be much of a muchness.
I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in
T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
Speakers: Zu Omen Def, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables
T'other system:
Echo Dot, Amptastic Mini One,Arcam A75 integrated, Celestion 5's, BK XLS-200 DF
A/V:
LG 55" OLED, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL Storm sub
Forget the past, it's gone. And don't worry about the future, it doesn't exist. There is only NOW.
KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009