Hi Griffo,
Quote:
Blimey, so many things to disagree with Marco on this thread
Well it'd be right bloody boring if everyone agreed with me all the time, so disagree away! :eyebrows:
Quote:
I still find it very strange with people declaring the Lyras to be clinical. I've never found this in my setup. I've certainly never heard bass as well textured and with as much depth and detail, both in my own setup and several others I've been to visit (in bake offs otr at friends). I always welcome going back to listening to the Dorian and it's great even sound.
It's simply a matter of context. Don't get me wrong, if Lyras are your 'thing' they'll do the job better than most. I've owned a couple (a Helikon and Argo i) so I know exactly what they do. The thing is when you get a 103R or 103Pro working optimally (and I mean optimally) they just sound utterly sublime in every area, particularly in the bass, which trust me makes Lyras sound positively anaemic! The only area they lack slightly in is absolute detail retrieval at higher frequencies. If you want to dissect every nuance on a recording with forensic precision then you need a cartridge with a good fine-line or VDH stylus. However, when a 103R or Pro have been optimised to their maximum potential everything else is spot on in the most beguiling way.
The standard 103 is not in the same league for a variety of reasons so I will omit it from the discussion. The 'R', Pro, or 'SA' versions are where it's at with 103s.
Trouble is, getting a 103R or Pro to sound right (as it was intended by the manufacturer) is both difficult and expensive. First of all, you need a top-notch direct-drive or high-mass belt-drive T/T to hear it at its best (bouncy decks or Regas just won't do) and, most crucially, a high-mass arm with a detachable headshell from a similar era to when the 103 itself was produced (think Fidelity Research, SME 3012, if you have a deck big enough to take it, Denons own arms, AT broadcast, etc). It only works on the 1210's arm once the counterweight balance and existing headshell have been upgraded to something which adds more mass.
Once all that's been attended to, you then need to buy a suitable MC step-up transformer which loads the 103 correctly and provides the correct impedance and gain, and then run it through a top-notch MM valve phono stage, if you wish to maximise its capabilities. The last bit is optional but preferable.
Now tell me, how many people do you know with 103s that've gone to all that bother? The fact is the majority of people using 103s are only hearing a fraction of its potential, and it is *this* that it gets unfairly judged on. The 103 may initially be cheap to buy because it's made by a huge Japanese company like Denon, but getting it to perform optimally sure as hell isn't!
Quote:
when I purchased the Orbe it had a DL103 on the end of the tonearm and I really couldn't wait to get it off. I really hated the thing. Of course I'm a bit more aware that a Rega based arm isn't the best to hear this cart now but judging from what people on the firums were saying at the time you wouldn't think that.
Exactly. Like I said, that's the problem. The 103 just isn't meant for set-ups like that. Cartridge and tonearm fashions have changed dramatically since the 103's era and so you simply can't use it with most of today's ancillaries if you have any notion of hearing it properly.
Quote:
As for the DL304 (and DL301ii I also own), both these carts benefit hugely from going through a step-up. I've owned a DL304 and it needs a real quality active set up to get the most out of it, I've heard it doing much better things through a step up. The problem I have with the DL304 and DL301ii is they lack dynamics, imo, especially when compared to the Lyra cart and even comparing both to a Goldring Elite you realise how soft the bass performance from these carts are - even through a step up.
I don't doubt that the 304 needs quality ancillaries to get it working optimally, but most people I know who use them get very good results simply running them through good quality active MC stages. It tends to be more the 103 and DL-S1 which are talked about in conjunction with SUTs. I suspect that Denons own models are produced more with the 103 in mind than the 304. However, I believe that all low output MCs perform better through specifically-matched SUTs than through even the best active MC stages. There is simply less noise that way, and noise is the main enemy where phono stages and moving coil cartridges are concerned.
Also, your DL301 sounds nothing like an optimally set-up 103R or Pro, so until you hear what the latter sounds like (perhaps by visiting me sometime?) you'll never be able to appreciate what I'm getting at and why I think Lyras sound so 'frigid' in comparison ;)
Quote:
I keep meaning to revisit the DL103, just for curiosity more than anything, now realising that more weight would need to be added to the Technoarm.
My advice is only do it if you're willing to go the whole hog as I've described. Any 'halfway house' measures will only result in disappointment and ultimately the wrong impression about what a 103R or Pro are truly capable of.
Quote:
What I find so strange about this is people like Arthur from Funk using DL103 carts in his demos with just a bog standard RB300. He always seems happy enough with it.
Yes, I know, but Arthur is Arthur. I know him quite well - he's a lovely chap and an extremely talented designer, but at shows his demonstrations - how shall I put it - are not set-up for ultimate sound quality... He uses fairly bog-standard ancillaries simply to show differences between his deck and a full Linn one, which are always readily apparent in my experience; the 103 fitted on the Rega 'does the job' in that sense. You'll notice that whenever the Sapphire is demonstrated by a Funk Firm dealer there are no 103s anywhere in sight! :)
Marco.