Looks are in order, but I must say, if there's no weight, then content is comprised!
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
Printable View
KEF Reference 103 near Hull, collect only. Could go cheap.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/KEF-Model...item266f7f22b6
Large vintage 'Transmission Electronics' speakers in Redruth, Cornwall. Interesting design, look like a bargain to me.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/203613634...%7C3000%7C7000
Looks like an interesting project for someone. Drivers alone worth more than the asking. Too far for me to drive. :doh:
Seems that TEL (Transmission Electronics Ltd) was a forerunner of IMF if I read Jerry at Falcon Acoustics post correctly. See:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/vend...ml#post5144001
I have a bit of an issue with people breaking classic vintage speakers for the value of the drive units, been asked to do this a few times and always refused.
Last time was with some KEF Calindas, drivers probably worth over £200, had a number of offers in that region for the drivers alone. Ended up selling the complete speakers to a pal for fifty quid, now used every day for TV and music in his large living room where they sound superb.
Breaking should be a criminal offence IMV ;)
Well at least you see fewer empty Tannoy cabinets for sale these days. It was at an epidemic rate a few years ago.
I wasn't suggesting they be broken up, nor would I agree that they are "classic vintage speakers" (I have never heard of Transmission Electronics), just that the value of the drive units are worth at least the asking price.
It does not follow a priori that a large cabinet stuffed with well respected drive units will sound good; by all means listen to them, but if found wanting there is no ethical reason not to cannibalise them for the drive units.
I was just commenting on the practice of breaking, not specifically replying to you directly.
I think if Transmission Electronics were the predecessor of IMF then these can be classed as classic or at least of historical worth. So would seem a shame to break them just to make a few quid profit.
I don't know that ethics comes into it, it's just a loudspeaker, not a moral conundrum. I just personally don't like to see old speakers like this demolished, same as I don't like to see old buildings demolished. Obviously the legal owner is absolutely free to do as he pleases with them - and to tell me to piss off :)