View Full Version : Guess what our Government Want To Do Now?
Spectral Morn
01-04-2012, 21:15
Have a read of these.......
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hd9UvMaapM3t9fbUCbxmVV3UbP-w?docId=N0046311333234828463A
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-british-governments-planning-to-keep-track-of-every-email-and-phone-message-sent-2012-4
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/11839515-big-brother-is-alive-and-well-in-the-united-kingdom
Regards D S D L
RobbieGong
01-04-2012, 21:40
Have a read of these.......
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hd9UvMaapM3t9fbUCbxmVV3UbP-w?docId=N0046311333234828463A
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-british-governments-planning-to-keep-track-of-every-email-and-phone-message-sent-2012-4
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/11839515-big-brother-is-alive-and-well-in-the-united-kingdom
Regards D S D L
Big brother, paranoia and snooping all in the name of combating terrorism - Yeah right !
I was spitting blood when I read this on the Register earlier today :steam:
There are no words . . .
Beechwoods
01-04-2012, 21:46
Make them work for a living...
https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en
Tor can really slow things up though and I don't feel I should have to do such a thing in the first place. It sucks, it really sucks.
Dominic Harper
01-04-2012, 21:49
What a joke, big brother watching you all over again.
Natalie;)
Beechwoods
01-04-2012, 21:49
Tor can really slow things up though and I don't feel I should have to do such a thing in the first place. It sucks, it really sucks.
Agreed, but if enough people circumvent surveillance, they'll have to think again, won't they!
It's just another illustration of how ridiculously out of touch they are, I don't know what planet they live on, but it ain't here!
Spectral Morn
01-04-2012, 21:55
I live in hope that the multitudes of sheep who just go through their lives munching away will take notice of this and tell our Government, NO loud and clear. This is the slippery slope.
Regards D S D L
bogle111
01-04-2012, 22:28
I think I shall rename the dog "s3mt3x"! I always refer to hot seasoning in my texts as "s3mt3x". Let them be slaves to their paranoia.
Now can everyone please refrain from saying "something cost a b@mb".
aquapiranha
01-04-2012, 22:54
this government truly suck.
bobbasrah
02-04-2012, 08:13
Security Services have been able to intercept all forms of telecommunications for many years now, most of it scanned automatically by machines, so there is no change, that reality is here. Even encryption methods require decryption to be available to the security services, so it more begs the question why formalise this in law.
No criminal or terrorist group will have used targetable communications for at least the last 10 years, after all, look how long it took to find Osama et al. Even aerial surveillance dodging has become a routine for the average afghan shepherd boy....
Your average rioting youth is probably considerably less so aware.....
Government paranoia about their own people has been around since Adam, so it really begs the question as to what capability will this augment rather than the bogus headline justification?
Spectral Morn
02-04-2012, 10:49
The main difference is if this bill goes through the government will not have to prove in a court that they have good reason to require access to the material, they will just force telecommunications companies etc to hand it over, that is the difference.
Here's a radical thought, lets go back to writing letters to communicate lol
Regards D S D L
bobbasrah
02-04-2012, 11:28
Good point mlud....
Another vote for Tor given in Beechwoods (Nick) Post.
Yep, it's a bit slower but the more who use it the faster it will get. What's the rush anyway. ;)
Try to give a bit of your bandwidth while your at it.
It's pretty easy to set up, runs on Win, Mac and Linux.
The main difference is if this bill goes through the government will not have to prove in a court that they have good reason to require access to the material, they will just force telecommunications companies etc to hand it over, that is the difference.
Here's a radical thought, lets go back to writing letters to communicate lol
Regards D S D L
They will still need to present a warrant.
As Bob says it is a good headline but in practical term it will make little difference to what already happens. Telecom companies have been co-operating with the law enforcement like thsi for years, I know as I was a Police Liason officer for a while back in the nineties.
Bluedroog
02-04-2012, 12:54
Make them work for a living...
https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en
Anyone shopped on Silk Road?
Of course nothing will happen.
We will take it on the chin like we did with cctv.
Apathy came in the 80s for the uk and has only got worse since.
Who ever thought we would start to lose our NHS to private companies?
It's happening yet hardly anyone really gives a toss.
The Grand Wazoo
02-04-2012, 18:08
........the government will not have to prove in a court that they have good reason to require access to the material....
I'm not defending the Govt. stance on this, but what has not been pointed out is that they will still need a Judge's signature to acquire access to actual conversations and/or the content of messages. The material that is being referred to in the new legislation is the fact that a call or message was made, where from and where to, the time and duration.
The ConDem'ed have failed to mention that when Labour proposed this very change to law, it was blown out of the water by all opposition parties as a gross infringement of civil liberties.
Ho-hum
Reid Malenfant
02-04-2012, 18:15
Everything is already monitored by Echelon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_%28signals_intelligence%29) & has been for years, yes it's those Americans again... :rolleyes:
twelvebears
02-04-2012, 18:29
If I'm honest, I don't have much time for the UK civil liberties groups, particularly those that rail against CCTV in towns. My belief is that only the guilty have anything to fear from this and I'd personally like those stupid enough to commit crimes on camera to get nicked.
That said, even I, Steve 'Hang 'em High' Gascoyne have to admit they are going to far with this one.
aquapiranha
02-04-2012, 21:49
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/big-brother-poster.jpghttp://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/big-brother-poster.jpg
aquapiranha
02-04-2012, 22:09
This too, had to make it lol...
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb256/aquapiranha/91668866.jpg
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.