+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 101

Thread: Fidelity to what? Or what are we tying to achieve with all our expensive gear?

  1. #11
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Posts: 180

    Default

    My system has to give me emotional response - meaning I listen to be moved. Accuracy or detail are not really relevant, but I do get a buzz from hearing that little noise not heard before.
    Often I fail to get sucked in, but when I am in the right place, mentally, I will often shed tears and have the biggest smile, even at the same time.
    I have never been able to describe what one bit of gear does or sounds like, but I do know what sounds better TO ME. That is all I care about really.
    Live music can be amazing, but rarely am I relaxed in my own home when I hear it, so I cannot become immersed in it. My father was a musician, and as a kid I got to hear lots of live music at home which was fantastic. Living where I do there are few chances to get to any concerts, but there have been a few times when I have listened to musicians jamming, and the pleasure is there, but it is different from being in my house, listening to what I want to hear when I choose.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: France

    Posts: 3,209
    I'm notAlone.

    Default

    Nice subject and nice posts from everybody.

    To me, listening to music, is NOT just reproducing with some kind of fidelity the instruments (or the recording or whatever).
    What I seek for is create a canvas where different memories can pile up, and where my mind can wander freely mixing these memories with my actual state of mind. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worst. Probably what some call "emotion".

    In order to achieve this, ideally, the system must reproduce the recording without any artifacts that may attract my attention.
    Any artifacts, be good (excessive detail in a part of the audible spectrum) or bad (unwanted distortion, blurring or unbalance) spoil my pleasure simply by being noticeable.

    So, "balance" is essential for my version of "hifi" but "accurate reproduction" (whatever this may be) may not be important.
    Dimitri.

    In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
    George Orwell

  3. #13
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,775
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Hmmm... I've just got on to this thread and I like it. I for one certainly do not want a 'live' sound from my Hi-Fi. If I want it live I go to a gig. What I do want from my Hi-Fi is music of a certain quality, played to a certain standard. I know not what that standard is until I hear it, and that I guess, is why we audition. I also want the music played in such a way that I can chillout and relax, maybe going into an almost dreamlike state. Yes, I know this is very personal but then the whole Hi-Fi/music thing is very personal. I do not own one 'live' album.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Cheshire, UK

    Posts: 2,832
    I'm Clive.

    Default

    I strive for a sound that gives the impression of being real, a presence in the room. This isn't the same as striving for an exact replication of a live sound, this simply isn't possible (yes, drum, piano etc - they real thing is incredible and challenging), it would be a pointless and fruitless journey.

  5. #15
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,540
    I'm David.

    Default

    Sixteen years ago, I attended many small scale jazz gigs, often in local pubs (ahem..) TC's I had gave me the scale and intensity of these instruments close-up when playing good 1950's recordings on CD (the CD mastering engineers obviously *listened* to their work and almost certainly had decent tape masters to work with).

    These days, I find the *warts-and-all* approach of pro monitors a bit too much. I can't play at ear-splitting levels as I used to when the neighbours were out and no longer care for the absolutely ruthless analysis a good monitor brings to the musical party. I suppose a pair of ADM9.1's would be perfect in my smallish room, but the bridged Crown/BC2's I use have easily enough clarity in the mid and top and the bass, although nowhere near world class, is good enough for now. I can just sit back and revel in the music, often hearing musical details I hadn't noticed before. The valve bits I have add to this "humanity" either by doing things solid state doesn't or, more likely, retaining the bits in better harmony with my ears and losing what doesn't matter (if you see what I mean).

    At the end of the day, we consumers are limited to the abilities of the mastering/cutting engineer for the quality of the software we buy and this is about as close as we can get to the original recordings I think.
    I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
    I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?

  6. #16
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,148
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DSJR View Post
    Sixteen years ago, I attended many small scale jazz gigs, often in local pubs (ahem..) TC's I had gave me the scale and intensity of these instruments close-up when playing good 1950's recordings on CD (the CD mastering engineers obviously *listened* to their work and almost certainly had decent tape masters to work with).

    These days, I find the *warts-and-all* approach of pro monitors a bit too much. I can't play at ear-splitting levels as I used to when the neighbours were out and no longer care for the absolutely ruthless analysis a good monitor brings to the musical party. I suppose a pair of ADM9.1's would be perfect in my smallish room, but the bridged Crown/BC2's I use have easily enough clarity in the mid and top and the bass, although nowhere near world class, is good enough for now. I can just sit back and revel in the music, often hearing musical details I hadn't noticed before. The valve bits I have add to this "humanity" either by doing things solid state doesn't or, more likely, retaining the bits in better harmony with my ears and losing what doesn't matter (if you see what I mean).

    At the end of the day, we consumers are limited to the abilities of the mastering/cutting engineer for the quality of the software we buy and this is about as close as we can get to the original recordings I think.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Posts: 180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haselsh1 View Post
    Hmmm... I've just got on to this thread and I like it. I for one certainly do not want a 'live' sound from my Hi-Fi. If I want it live I go to a gig. What I do want from my Hi-Fi is music of a certain quality, played to a certain standard. I know not what that standard is until I hear it, and that I guess, is why we audition. I also want the music played in such a way that I can chillout and relax, maybe going into an almost dreamlike state. Yes, I know this is very personal but then the whole Hi-Fi/music thing is very personal. I do not own one 'live' album.
    That is what I was trying to say.
    However, I do own several live albums, and many can hit the spot for me when heard in MY room..

  8. #18
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,556
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steveinspain View Post
    That is what I was trying to say.
    However, I do own several live albums, and many can hit the spot for me when heard in MY room..
    I listen to a lot of live albums - a good live recording adds something special that you never get in a studio recording - Off the top of my head I'm thinking of Neil Young - Rust never sleeps, Hendrix in the West, Sinatra at the Sands etc
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

  9. #19
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Posts: 180

    Default

    ..and I'll add the Allman Brothers 'Live at the fillmore east', CSNY '4 way street' and Genesis 'Seconds out' among my favourites..

  10. #20
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,775
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steveinspain View Post
    ..and I'll add the Allman Brothers 'Live at the fillmore east', CSNY '4 way street' and Genesis 'Seconds out' among my favourites..
    Ooops... I have Genesis 'Seconds Out' on vinyl...!!!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •