Well, "better", this depends on what you like/prefer. There just could be one you just like more, while so far it seems there's none that's better in all disciplines.
Also, are you looking for headphones or line out opamp? I can't comment on that, did not dig it long enough.
See that bunch of posts n remarks. Sorry for the layout, take it as is.
George at the end sums it up very well, and that's why i am still browsing pages.
Initially I found the THS4032 very clear, but after a while I found it a bit thin and fatiguing. IMO, the LM4562 sounds more balanced and natural, but not quite as clear.
Given a choice, I would pick the OPA2132 over the OPA2134. I found the 2134 more veiled and somewhat "phasey" on the highs, while the 2132 sounds a bit more open and natural. Some have claimed they sound the same, but that hasn't been my experience.
hi
have you tried this opamp ths4032?
some say it is better than opa2132 or lm6172 which almost have the same spec if im not mistaken...
so what opamp would you recommend?
ths4302 is different from ths4032
Yes, I found it only in SMT version. It is good, extremelly clean and detailed, but somewhat sterile.
In RCD971 as drop-in replacements the best sounding opamps for me were AD825, AD828 and 2132. OP275 is also ok-
I suspect because the first production run was using OP275 before OPA2604, so the circuit was probably optimized for it.
Originally posted by RICMAN
isnt it that the ad828 is used in video application?
Exactly that one. And directly dropped in Rotel RCD971, without additional decoupling, you can hear "birds" - it oscilates without additional care. However, it is very good sounding opamp, smooth, fast and dynamical. AD828 is more than 3 times faster than both LM6172 and THS4032, so this is proof that RCD971 has already very good elaborated layout.
Just did a comparison between opa2132 and 2134. The former is significantly better with a liquid midrange and airy treble. I am really puzzled by the rave about 2134 on various sites.
I've now been listening to the THS4031 for over a week and I have to say that it is the most cleanest sound, especially through the mids and highs I have ever heard of the multitude of opamps I've tried, which is every one except the hidiously expensive OPA627, this could give it a run from what I've read, but at $60 a pop in Australia, you would have to be mad to buy it, and I need 4, and I've heard it's a bit too laid back for my tastes.
Now that I've told you about the good, let me tell you the bad, and it's a big one.
The THS4031 [single channel, specs same as 4032]has one glaring problem compared to my previous favourite opamp the AD825, it does not have the rhythm of the AD825, and that is a major fault to me, it sounds so good that you forget your not tapping your foot, yet now and again you do get a bit of foot tapping rhythm come through but most of the time it sounds constricted in that department.
Back to the AD825 and your feel that the rhythm beast has been unleashed, even though it's not quite as good in the mids and highs it is still my favourite.
Conclusion, I hate opamps, there's not one that does everything right, I'm now starting to look at the ready made discrete type of I/V stages, and that is another world of hurt and anguish.
Cheers George


Originally Posted by Gazjam


Reply With Quote
