+ Reply to Thread
Page 83 of 310 FirstFirst ... 3373818283848593133183 ... LastLast
Results 821 to 830 of 3091

Thread: Justin & Jerry's Hifi Blog

  1. #821
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,510
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Yep & yep
    .

  2. #822
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,510
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by User211 View Post
    .... However, the Krell KAV250a is a totally different story - it sounded much more natural than the A21 did. Easily the best power amp I have heard with the MBLs - including my own 211 monoblocks. However, I reckon that McCormack CDP is damned fine as is the Tisbury. You just don't get results as good as I heard yesterday with something naff in the chain.
    ---
    Anyway back to Jerry's system - if I couldn't run my Apogee Duetta Sigs I'd probably track down some 116Fs. Yesterday they just did everything brilliantly. Which worries me as I have never liked Krells. I heard a KSA 300 a couple of weeks before driving some Ushers. I suspect it is even better than the KAV250 TBH. That plus 116Fs could be truly awesome!
    Hmmm, yup. I agree that the Krell is a better amp than the Parasound, although I did enjoy that.

    A bigger Krell is on my To Do list, given the success of the 250a. But I think they do have a somewhat darker sound ... ? .... albeit more sophisticated. And they cost multiples of what the 250a set me back.
    The box swapper's maxim is "there is ALWAYS something better, or at least interestingly different" - it wouldn't be fun otherwise!
    .

  3. #823
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Bristol

    Posts: 7,275
    I'm Justin.

    Default

    More on the "never liked Krells". A KSA50 was rubbish driving my Duettas. I'm sure a good valve pre would have helped in that situation. Also, at shows they nearly always seem to be driving Wilsons. That never works IMHO - much prefer Wilsons with big ARCs.

  4. #824
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Bristol

    Posts: 7,275
    I'm Justin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jandl100 View Post
    But I think they do have a somewhat darker sound ... ? .... albeit more sophisticated.
    I think that's the impression I got - might be a bit less lively too. That might NOT be what you want... but until you try...

  5. #825
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,510
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Hmm, I think I like things more on the brightly lit and lively side! -- has anyone got a Big Krell they'd like to hoik over to the lovely Forest of Dean in deepest Gloucestershire to hear what it sounds like with some very fine MBL speakers?!
    .

  6. #826
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,510
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Arrived today, and sounding very nice indeed!
    Notable, at first listen, for its clarity and presence.

    [/URL]
    .

  7. #827
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 37,772
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    A lot of dust on that record Jerry!

    The Ortofon MC 25FL has many admirers (me included), and I would have one were it not for my collection of other, and possible better, Ortofons.
    Barry

  8. #828
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,510
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Ah well, camera flash is a cruel exposer of undusted records. - it sounded fine, though.

    At least you're not saying my lovely new cart is utter shite and may well explode in a ball of flame.
    .

  9. #829
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 37,772
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Oh no - "utter shite" it ain't!
    Barry

  10. #830
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Bristol

    Posts: 7,275
    I'm Justin.

    Default

    U sure? I've had 3 Ortos and I haven:t thought that much of a single one of them LOL!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •