
Originally Posted by
Reffc
Sorry chaps but I would rather drown myself in a vat of pickled eggs than have a piece of Formica anywhere near my speakers!
It may well be excellent sonically as something to form a compound lamination with but another answer surely is to use birch ply in place of the chip board in the first place? Formica...yuck!



I guess it doesn't matter what you use but the prinicple is the same....lamination of materials with different resonant properties combined such that their natural resonant frequency isn't excited within the audio bandwidth or more accurately, is designed such that resonant decay time is minimised (the opposite of "ringing"). Worst material by far if left untreated has to be MDF. Some chip boards are actually very good (better in fact than some plywoods) and dense ply with a high resin/pva content (courtesy of lots of thin laminations) possibly the best of the timber based materials?
Its a whole other topic and one worthy of a thread on it's own but lets leave Formica out of it, unless it's to restore a '60's kitchen


(tongue firmly in cheek just in case the Formica police come after me....)
Mmmmm. Pickled eggs!
Anyway, formica is very stiff and has a laminar structure, but no real directional grain as such (although the manufacture is linear). I doubt it offers much in the way of panel damping, but it will certainly add to the stiffness (and weight) of panels.
It is hard wearing to a point, the surface is hard, but the edges chip fairly easily.
I agree that chipboard can be good, it is pretty resistant to vibration, unlike MDF and hard (birch) ply is even worse. Just try tapping a board of each and you'll see what I mean.
Regardless of material choice though, much panel resonance can be largely cut by intelligently utilised cabinet bracing.
It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!