+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 78

Thread: Small Secondary Speakers

  1. #21
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,143
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Looks to be a bit fierce (and peaky) in the presence band

    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  2. #22
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Yep, but then speaker response curves rarely look good. Here's the Stirling LS3/5a frequency response:


  3. #23
    Join Date: Dec 2010

    Location: Northampton

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    There's a nice pair of Tannoy Mini Autographs on ebay. Nice if you like that sort of thing.
    Mark

  4. #24
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: Middlesex, UK

    Posts: 4,481
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    How about these, should be good with the Falcon history and experience:

    http://www.falconacoustics.co.uk/ls3...i-monitor.html
    Spendorman

  5. #25
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spendorman View Post
    How about these, should be good with the Falcon history and experience
    Now that's interesting, thanks Alex.

  6. #26
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,540
    I'm David.

    Default

    Those little Tannoys will give you ear-ache unless they're tamed with a fruity and soft amp to drive them...

    Have any of you EVER compared the likes of spitchy old MiSSSSSSSSion 760's and 780's (SE or otherwise) and Keesonik Kubs with the likes of a good original LS3/5A? The latter on domestic launch were so much better than anything anywhere near their size it seems daft to even contemplate the ghastly Missions with inadequate crossovers and nassssty little tweeter implentation. Times has moved on and the plots of the Stirlings were averaged out in a room with a 2db lift in the mid bass I think from memory (the P3ESR's have a similar bass bump and their review seemed to discuss that the room didn't help this aspect).

    Like I said, give Doug Stirling a phone before ordering anything, as he'll give you the low-down on exactly what the kit offers. Got to be better than AVI Neutron 5's
    I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
    I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?

  7. #27
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Aughton, Ormskirk

    Posts: 2,855
    I'm Jerry.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DSJR View Post
    Those little Tannoys will give you ear-ache unless they're tamed with a fruity and soft amp to drive them...

    Have any of you EVER compared the likes of spitchy old MiSSSSSSSSion 760's and 780's (SE or otherwise) and Keesonik Kubs with the likes of a good original LS3/5A? The latter on domestic launch were so much better than anything anywhere near their size it seems daft to even contemplate the ghastly Missions with inadequate crossovers and nassssty little tweeter implentation. Times has moved on and the plots of the Stirlings were averaged out in a room with a 2db lift in the mid bass I think from memory (the P3ESR's have a similar bass bump and their review seemed to discuss that the room didn't help this aspect).

    Like I said, give Doug Stirling a phone before ordering anything, as he'll give you the low-down on exactly what the kit offers. Got to be better than AVI Neutron 5's
    Well, I have never been so insulted in all my life, spitchy mission speakers indeed. (Don't know what it is but it doesn't sound nice) LOADS of people on here like them.
    I am flouncing out of here
    Jerry
    Hifi: IPL transmission line floorstanding speakers, Squeezebox Touch, Denafrips Ares 11 DAC, DCB1 Pre-amplifier, Croft Series 7 power amp.
    Custom Hifi cables HA10SE headphone amplifier and Hifiman HE-400 headphones.
    AV system: LG 55B7, Denon AVR -x2300w receiver, Quad 12L (front) 11c Centre and 11L rear . Velodyne DD15 subwoofer.

  8. #28
    Join Date: Dec 2010

    Location: Northampton

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DSJR View Post
    Those little Tannoys will give you ear-ache unless they're tamed with a fruity and soft amp to drive them...

    Pah!!
    Mark

  9. #29
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,540
    I'm David.

    Default

    Again, have you listened to them? Bigger proper modern Tannoys are one thing, but the babies? The little Autographs do look fun though when they're not playing.

    I sold Missions for many years and was subjected to 760's, 780's and the Se models for their entire production life. I always preferred their models with bigger bass units I'm afraid (700LE and 781 from memory of around this period) although I accept they wouldn't really be suitable for desktop mounting due to too much undamped bass possibly..
    I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
    I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?

  10. #30
    Join Date: Dec 2010

    Location: Northampton

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DSJR View Post
    Again, have you listened to them?

    Yes.
    Mark

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •