+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 150

Thread: Valve sound versus solid state...

  1. #81
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,465
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Indeed, Anthony.

    You're definitely right about integrated amplifiers; these are largely neglected by the supposed cognoscenti in their rush to obtain the latest and greatest pre/power combos, and sometimes dealers chasing the (often) larger profit margins of the latter can also influence things.

    A high quality, properly designed, integrated amplifier (valve or ss) has the potential to outperform some highly regarded pre/power amp combinations due to the reasons you've mentioned. I don't think some people realise just how much of a detrimental effect longer signal paths can have on the sound, poor quality cables linking the different boxes together, and just general 'over-complication' in some designs.

    Use the highest quality parts possible, implement them correctly, and K.I.S.S (keep it simple, stupid) is the best policy in hi-fi design!

    Regarding active and passive preamps, I have something interesting for you to listen to when you come up

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & regulator mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat with Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight. Isonoe feet & boots. Ortofon RS-212D tonearm with Denon DL-103GL, in a Denon PCL-300 headshell, fitted with Funk Firm Houdini and Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp and Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp, fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.

  2. #82
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,148
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    look forward to that
    anthony,TD...

  3. #83
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Gerrards Cross

    Posts: 3,164
    I'm Tony.

    Default

    On this very subject, have any of the valve boys heard the new Burning amps?
    Most acceptable
    Coherent Systems
    Real high end sound with musicality not hifi

  4. #84
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,775
    I'm Shaun.

    Default For what it's worth...

    Mmmm... yeah, for what it's worth... my perfect amplifier would be valve. It would be a push pull 300B with no feedback and around 30 Watts per channel. The drivers would be 6SN7GT's. Now that, I'd love. I used to have a WAD 300B PP amplifier around 1998 and that amp was the finest sounding amp I had ever heard up to that time. Of course there's no chance of ever getting another. There is however a very close companion... Icon Audio have a 300B PP amplifier that has a tiny bit of feedback in circuit. Why haven't I bought one...??? The bloody thing is around 1700 pounds and therefore around twice what my pocket will sustain these days. I am therefore going to have to make do with a Naim Nait 5i when I have saved up the pennies. There is no way that is going to come anywhere near my dream 300B but, as with most things, it's a compromsie.

  5. #85
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Bungalow

    Posts: 13

    Default

    Hi-I'm new here !

    I have several valve amps, PP & SE and they all have their merits.

    I have yet to find a solid state amp that i could live with,but it might exist.

    Once you find a good,efficient speaker then low power SE valves are all you need. 300b is my fave (at the moment !)
    bis pueri senes !

  6. #86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. C View Post
    On this very subject, have any of the valve boys heard the new Burning amps?
    Most acceptable
    Do you mean Berning ?
    Hans

    MBL 1531 -> Allnic L-4000 -> Audiolab 8000S used as power amp only -> Quad 2805. Cables: Transparent Ultra

  7. #87
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,540
    I'm David.

    Default

    I own the perfect amps for my needs

    I inherited them, so they cost me nothing (well, the bottom two didn't), they were made for pro as well as domestic use so are honest sounding and bomb proof. They run cool and have no "attitude" at all.

    Boring? Possibly, but I love the way they just get on with the job of feeding some lovely music and speech into the Spendors, never obviously getting in the way...

    Last edited by DSJR; 12-02-2009 at 18:47.
    I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
    I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?

  8. #88
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,148
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    hi all,
    seems there is a healthy following from users of both technologies sharing their views on this thread, which is great as the whole reason for starting this thread was not to promote the virtues of one technology over the other, but to get opinions from users of both, and for all to share and contribute their views on why one technology works for them. i have already given some positive pointers and atributes as to why my own prefrence is valves, but as we all know both technologies have negative and positive atributes, so lets hear more from all who have experienced the diffrences and what finaly swayed them to choose one technology over the other in their paticular system...
    anthony,TD...

  9. #89
    Join Date: Jun 2008

    Location: N. Ireland

    Posts: 2,475
    I'm Steve.

    Default

    I have used both in the past, and have changed from one to the other occasionally. both have their strengths. Blanket statements like "valves are just better" for example show a bit of ignorance IMO, each have their strength and weaknesses. YMMV
    They swim... the mark of Satan is upon them. They must hang.


    FLAC / WDTV Live / Cambridge Audio / Tannoy VX12

  10. #90
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Bungalow

    Posts: 13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aquapiranha View Post
    Blanket statements like "valves are just better" for example show a bit of ignorance IMO, each have their strength and weaknesses. YMMV
    Well, I must be ignorant !

    Valves ARE better !

    Not all valves are created equal though.

    When i hear a transistor (or class D/T ) amp that I could live with I would revise my opinion.
    bis pueri senes !

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •