+ Reply to Thread
Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 816171819 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 182

Thread: And so the next major audiophile engineering challenge is, err, well what?

  1. #171
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,936
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    From The Grave


    The original post is ............a-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l the way back there, so here's the crux of the biscuit:

    What do the forum feel is the most significant technological / engineering challenge facing audiophile designers currently?

    I'm not thinking here of the makers reducing the production cost or similarly ‘mundane’ economic aspects like that. Rather, for example, achieving say bigger performance from smaller boxes, or perhaps generating ribbon clarity for cone drivers. Issues like that really.

  2. #172
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    - Displays that can be clearly read from across the room

    - Remote controls that are ergonomically designed

    - Balanced XLR connections that have the same polarity worldwide

    - Finishes that can be properly cleaned

    - Warranties and MTBF that reflect the price paid

  3. #173
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Moved to frozen north, beyond Inverness

    Posts: 2,663
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Filterlab View Post
    Seconded. Offboard DACs are really big news at the moment as more folk discover that (almost) any digital source running through a quality DAC can sound amazing.
    For me DACs are good, but the inability to handle analogue sources is sometimes a problem given the amps I currently use. A multi input DAC with a few analogue inputs might be useful.

    i don't suppose multi channel is of too much interest, but maybe some form of multi channel DAC could be useful, though debatable whether high quality would be an issue for mass markets.

    There are still some who seem to like, for example, multi channel SACD sound, and ways of doing that without having to hook up lots of different kit with many different wires might be a good way forward. It'd probably need wireless distibution to the loudspeakers though to avoid cables, so the wireless DACs to select the channel and then driving the speakers directly could do the trick. There'd not be much point in doing this badly though, as the SQ possible from a SACD deck or similar digital "transport" ought to be high.

    Probably add ad least £100 to the cost of each speaker, and maybe a lot more.

    Ability to reassign speakers to channels quickly (electronically) would be useful. For example it might be easy to move just one speaker in a multi channel set up to play 3 channel recordings, with a quick reassignment of the centre channel. Depends of course how many speakers are available, but would avoid rather tedious rewiring and connecting to amps just to play a few recordings.
    Dave

  4. #174
    Join Date: Mar 2010

    Location: Sheffield

    Posts: 2,899
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    The integration of all the potential audio sources into one unit.
    Kuzma Stabi/S 12", (LP12-bastard) DC motor and optical tacho psu, Benz LP, Paradise (phonostage). Imac m1, gustard A18dac, Bruno Putzeys balanced pre, neurochrome 486 dual mono amps, Yamaha NS1000m with raal ribbons

  5. #175
    Join Date: Jun 2011

    Location: Skien, Norway

    Posts: 931
    I'm Jostein.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave2010 View Post
    For me DACs are good, but the inability to handle analogue sources is sometimes a problem given the amps I currently use. A multi input DAC with a few analogue inputs might be useful.
    The Furutech Esprit might be getting closer to what you need:

    http://www.adl-av.com/products/usbdac/esprit/
    My hifi system:

    Turntable: Technics SL-1200 MKII, Ortofon 2M Bronze cartridge, Mike New bearing, MCRU PSU (c), Oyaide HS-CF headshell, Oyaide MJ-12 TT mat, Vantage Audio Copper mat, Isonoe Isolation Feet, Isodek IF-2 isolation platform, Furutech Monza LP stabilizer, Herbie's Hal-O JR damper Phono Stage: Hagerman Cornet 3 (prototype) Amplifiers: EAR 868L Preamp, Transcription Audio 211 Heaven Power amp, Bob Carver Cherry 180 power amp CD Player: Ear Yoshino Acute Tuner: Magnum Dynalab 90T Speakers: Vandersteen 2CE SigII, Townshend Audio Super Tweeters, Transcription Audio Speakers Cables and stuff: LFD Audio interconnects and speaker cables, Mark Grant G2000HD, BlackCat Electronics, Van Den Hul Clearwater, Black Rhodium mains cables, Black Rhodium mains block, Finite Elements Resonator, Townhsend Stella Speaker stands, Pro Audio Bono hifi rack, Herbie's spike gliders, Herbie's Ultravox and Hal-O tube dampers, Super Black Hole CD mat Record Cleaning Machine: Loricraft PRC4

  6. #176
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,936
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave2010 View Post
    A multi input DAC with a few analogue inputs might be useful.
    ..........so a preamp then? With an integrated DAC?

    I started a thread about this a while ago but it never really took off. I see this from the other end of the telescope - it seems to me that many preamps are being marketed as DAC's at the moment but they are limited in that they only cater for digital sources.

  7. #177
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    I own such an amp. It is called a Ditton DDP 5.1. It has 4 digital inputs several analogue inputs, and even a phono input. Bought it many years ago. I think Richer Sound sold it. Price was about £1500.

  8. #178
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Moved to frozen north, beyond Inverness

    Posts: 2,663
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I own such an amp. It is called a Ditton DDP 5.1. It has 4 digital inputs several analogue inputs, and even a phono input. Bought it many years ago. I think Richer Sound sold it. Price was about £1500.
    What kind of digital inputs did it have? Unless you use HDMI or some other input, or compressed digital data most units with SPDIF or TOSLINK inputs - maybe even AES, will only do 2 channel/digital input connection.

    It should be possible to use digital connections to feed at least 10 channels down one "wire".

    Equipment compatibility, amongst other things, is an issue here. Maybe wireless really is the way to go.
    Dave

  9. #179
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    I lost the instructions years ago, but I could connect my DVD player TOSLINK output to it and play back 5.1 audio tracks via the Ditton. It is a 5.1 amp as well after all.

  10. #180
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Moved to frozen north, beyond Inverness

    Posts: 2,663
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I lost the instructions years ago, but I could connect my DVD player TOSLINK output to it and play back 5.1 audio tracks via the Ditton. It is a 5.1 amp as well after all.
    I suspect that was in a compressed digital mode, appropriate for surround sound DVDs e.g films, rather than music.
    Dave

+ Reply to Thread
Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 816171819 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •