+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Phase as an issue in audio.

  1. #21
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,540
    I'm David.

    Default

    I know Jerry, but there's NOTHING on the Tellurium website other than a suggestion of pre-programming (create a "problem" to market a fix for) and subjective comments. I'm sure these wires are very good, but for "Plush" to suggest that £285 or so is a "modestly priced cable" is madness in the extreme

    Anyway, if you like them in comparison to the usual Mark Grant and cheaper recommendations on here, then that's fine, 'cos at least you've compared

    Back to bass absolute phase, I hear quite a difference here, but of course, I'm not switching "just" the drive units over, since the crossovers aren't symmetrical (my bridged power amps are specified as balanced on their outputs when used this way though so supposedly shouldn't react)..
    I can't go on and I can't go back, I don't feel so matter of fact,
    I tried and tried to make good sense, What's the good to try it all again?

  2. #22
    Join Date: Dec 2011

    Location: Far Away

    Posts: 1,373
    I'm Gone.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by f1eng View Post
    There is probably a significant difference between the 2 discussions here, absolute phase and phase shifts with frequency.
    There are very, very few phase coherent speaker designs, so it is quite likely nobody on the forum has ever listened to phase coherent reproduction.
    I have heard phase coherent speakers many times, in anechoic, domestic and studio locations and they always have a greater realism than speakers that are not phase coherent. Time and phase are, in my opinion, paramount in reproduction of audio.

  3. #23
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Redcar By The Sea - Sand With Everything

    Posts: 2,235
    I'm Andy.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulStewart View Post
    I have heard phase coherent speakers many times, in anechoic, domestic and studio locations and they always have a greater realism than speakers that are not phase coherent. Time and phase are, in my opinion, paramount in reproduction of audio.
    Hi Guys

    Would you consider the VMPS (Veritone Minimum Phase Speakers) range of speakers as Phase Coherent?
    Sometimes manfacturer terminology can be confusing.

    Andy - SDDW
    HV Electrical Engineer - SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel) Plant

  4. #24
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,031
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    How about full range single driver speakers?

  5. #25
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Wantage

    Posts: 265
    I'm Frank.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ali Tait View Post
    How about full range single driver speakers?
    Unlikely. Single driver speakers are working in cone breakup "NXT" mode at medium and high frequencies.
    As soon as you get cone breakup you lose phase coherence. Phase coherence is lost in pretty well all crossovers too.

  6. #26
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Wantage

    Posts: 265
    I'm Frank.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulStewart View Post
    I have heard phase coherent speakers many times, in anechoic, domestic and studio locations and they always have a greater realism than speakers that are not phase coherent. Time and phase are, in my opinion, paramount in reproduction of audio.
    Very interesting indeed. Which speakers are these please? Do you know how the designer and manufacturer managed to achieve phase coherence? If you heard them in anechoic conditions you -are- perhaps the designer??

    As an engineer who started off life in noise and vibration research transducers have always fascinated me, and with this hobby I find microphones, pickup cartridges (and all the vibrating paraphernalia they are bolted to) and speakers particularly interesting.

  7. #27
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,031
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by f1eng View Post
    Unlikely. Single driver speakers are working in cone breakup "NXT" mode at medium and high frequencies.
    As soon as you get cone breakup you lose phase coherence. Phase coherence is lost in pretty well all crossovers too.
    So what about electrostatics then?

  8. #28
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Wantage

    Posts: 265
    I'm Frank.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ali Tait View Post
    So what about electrostatics then?
    In terms of phase accuracy (assuming you have a phase accurate recording, i.e. not mixed multi-track) planar drivers should be the most accurate, depending on design, and whether they have a crossover. So ribbons and electrostatics should be OK.
    Most have other problems though

  9. #29
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,031
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Yep, agreed. However in my experience statics have the most transparent sound of any speaker type. Wonder how much of this is due to phase coherence?

  10. #30
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,329
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    I recall adverts for a 4-way loudspeaker from a company called Orchid which claimed to be phase-coherent. Anyone remember that? It was mega money, about £20K.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •