+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 130 FirstFirst ... 567891757107 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 1297

Thread: Beresford Bushmaster DAC

  1. #61
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: london

    Posts: 1,133
    I'm george.

    Default without headphone?

    Sorry,New here,so Im on a steep learning curve.Is it possible to have the bushmaster without a headphone input/board when its released?I would prefer maybe better other components instead.What do you think Stan?

  2. #62
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    Sure George. But a personalized DAC like that would cost you between £500 to £1000. We would design and build a different PCB and front panel for you and solder each individual component by hand. The bulk of the extra cost will be purely labour.
    PM me a list of the components that you would like to be better and I'll PM you a more accurate cost. I'll need a non-refundable deposit as well .

  3. #63
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: london

    Posts: 1,133
    I'm george.

    Default without headphones?

    Ouch.....my middle name is obviously naive...never thought of all that.
    I think Ill just wait for the bushmaster..
    thanks for the reply though.

  4. #64
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: Sheffield

    Posts: 442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seoirse2002 View Post
    Ouch.....my middle name is obviously naive...never thought of all that.
    I think Ill just wait for the bushmaster..
    thanks for the reply though.
    Don't let it worry you George, you will soon get used to the "Customer" not always being right!

    Regards

    Chris

  5. #65
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,289

    Default

    I have had a lot of email correspondence on this whole headphone output thing. Part of the problem is tied to a different thread where a couple of people imply that DACs with inbuilt headphone circuits are inferior in some ways. Some readers of AoS put two and two together and concluded that a DAC without a headphone output is superior. It just goes to show how personal opinions can be seen as established technical facts.
    Another point raised on those emails to me is whether the Bushmaster will be sold without a headphone output. The answer to that is NO. I shall be designing a DAC without headphone output however, but it will cost more than the Bushmaster since many of the parts are high end and expensive.

  6. #66
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Portsmouth

    Posts: 119
    I'm Val.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I shall be designing a DAC without headphone output however, but it will cost more than the Bushmaster since many of the parts are high end and expensive.
    This sounds very interesting, more information needed

    Val

  7. #67
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I shall be designing a DAC without headphone output however, but it will cost more than the Bushmaster since many of the parts are high end and expensive.
    Now that is of interest, although my souped up Caiman sounds so good there is no hurry

  8. #68
    Join Date: Jul 2009

    Location: Schleswig-Holstein (north sea coast), Germany

    Posts: 814
    I'm Werner.

    Default

    Stanley,

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    Part of the problem is tied to a different thread where a couple of people imply that DACs with inbuilt headphone circuits are inferior in some ways.
    guess I’m part of the “couple of people” you mention, so I would like to put some facts straight here. I always wrote explicitly that I’m not a hardware engineer, and I never claimed to describe facts about the quality of components used in DACs and headphone amplifiers.

    I expressed that according to my own personal listening experience the stand-alone DAC plus the stand-alone headphone amplifier I use now sound a lot better and pleasing than your DAC/headphone combinations known as (gatorized) Caiman and TC-7520. The headphones used for my A/B tests were the AKG K271, AKG K701, Beyerdynamic DT 990 and Beyerdynamic T1 (both models with an impedance of 600 Ω).

    I encourage anyone who considers using high-end, high impedance headphones with any of your DAC/headphone combinations to compare its performance to the playback quality of an audio chain with a stand-alone, bare bones DAC and a stand-alone headphone amplifier and to develop an own opinion afterwards.

    Nothing more I stated, but also nothing less.

    Werner.
    Last edited by Werner Berghofer; 08-12-2011 at 09:57.
    Mac OS X iTunes → Schiit Bifrost DAC → Yamaha AX-592 → Triangle Zays XS Grand Angle | AKG K712 Pro headphones | my last.fm profile

  9. #69
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: North Cambs UK, Earth, Sol, Orion - Cygnus arm of galaxy

    Posts: 11,165
    I'm MadeOfDeadGiantStarsThatExplodedEonsAgo.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    Part of the problem is tied to a different thread where a couple of people imply that DACs with inbuilt headphone circuits are inferior in some ways. Some readers of AoS put two and two together and concluded that a DAC without a headphone output is superior.
    Quote Originally Posted by Werner Berghofer View Post
    Stanley,

    guess I’m part of the “couple of people” you mention, so I would like to put some facts straight here. I always wrote explicitly that I’m not a hardware engineer, and I never claimed to describe facts about the quality of components used in DACs and headphone amplifiers.
    Yes I think I might be a guilty party to

    If you read what I posted though you'll see that at no point did I say that a DAC will be inferior with a built in headphone amp, though obviously it could be, it depends on the quality of build & components etc.

    What I did say is that the headphone amplifiers built into DACs are generally a compromise A DIL IC is not going to be happy to drive low impedance headphones, where as it may drive higher impedances fairly easily. However if the voltage supply is low then it may well not even do that very well.

    Hense unless some purpose built headphone amp that doesn't involve the use of a DIL IC (or maybe just as a driver) is built then the headphone output will be a compromise & an external headphone amp would be a wholly better proposition

    If people can't read properly it is hardly my fault...

    As a perfect example of a no-compromise headphone amp take a look at this PDF file Low impedance, high impedance it just wouldn't matter... It'll sound the same & drive them all to full level
    Last edited by Reid Malenfant; 07-12-2011 at 20:07. Reason: added link to PDF as well as banter
    Bests, Mark



    "We must believe in free will. We have no choice" Isaac Bashevis Singer

  10. #70
    Join Date: Aug 2010

    Location: Montseny National Park, Catalonia

    Posts: 3,254
    I'm John.

    Default

    Definitely guilty along with Mark and Werner
    It’s not so much a question of the Dac being inferior because of it having a headphone output, it’s that its likely that the headphone output is likely to be inferior to a stand alone dedicated headphone amp.

    Cant see why anyone should have a problem with this.
    Single spur balanced Mains. Self built music server with 3 seperate linear PSU, Intel i5, 16 GB RAM no hard drive (various Linux OS). Benchmark Dac2 HGC, single ended XLR interconnects/Belkin cable. Exposure 21RC Pre, Super 18 Power (recap & modified). Modded World Audio HD83 HP amp. Hand built Monitors with external crossovers , Volt 250 bass & ABR, Scanspeak 13M8621 Mid & Scanspeak D2905/9300 Hi. HD595 & Beyer 880 (600 ohm) cans.

    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
    -Bertrand Russel

    John.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 130 FirstFirst ... 567891757107 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •