Closed Thread
Page 4 of 35 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 347

Thread: Why do you need a speaker crossover - discuss

  1. #31
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cardiff, South Wales, UK

    Posts: 315
    I'm paul.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    How do I use my TRULY WONDERFUL (never heard better speakers in my life) Tannoy Monitor Golds, without any crossovers? Discuss....

    Marco.

    P.S Richard, you have email!
    Marco use a high pass filter on the HF Compression Driver and no filter on the
    Bass/Mid it sounds great
    Paul

    Thorens TD 124, Thorens 12" Arm refurbished by Alfred, Shure M55, Denon 103r ,whest PS30R , Auditorium A23 Sony XA20 ES, Benchmark DAC 1 HDR, Elite Townsens 600c Pre,
    DPA Enlightenment DAC, , , Radford STA 25 Series 3, Aurex ST S80 , Tannoy Monitor Golds 15" Tannoy York Enclosures, TEAC DS H01, Isotek Substation, Abbey Road Reference Speaker Cables
    and some other stuff

  2. #32
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 111,021
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Careful there, the Hyperbole Police have spies everywhere...
    Hehehe.... Indeed! The point I'm making though is that it's all about achieving the best balance of compromises.

    No audio equipment is perfect.

    Therefore, regardless if crossovers make things worse (an undisputable fact), I'd lose far more than I'd gain by using intrinsically worse sounding speakers than the Tannoys, just to lose the crossovers in a totally different design!

    Regarding, making further modifications... Thanks for the tips, guys, but I can't really be arsed. Why attempt to 'fix' what ain't broken?

    The crossovers in my Tannoys are very simple, though, and of the highest quality, so I reckon that I have achieved the best balance of compromises, and they stun me every time I listen to how wonderfully they reproduce music - job done!

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & regulator mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat with Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight. Isonoe feet & boots. Ortofon RS-212D tonearm with Denon DL-103GL in a Denon PCL-300 headshell, fitted with Funk Firm Houdini and Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp and Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp, fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.

  3. #33
    Join Date: May 2011

    Location: Epping

    Posts: 716
    I'm Richard.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aquapiranha View Post
    I thought so. did you post something else recently about BBC style speakers being a bit old hat and not up to the job? I don't think I have ever heard any 'BBC' style speakers if you are referring to the small stand mount type though I have heard Marco's old Spendor S100's, do they fall into that catergory?
    I don't know but I presume they don't. Companies like Harbeth and Spendor now a days only pay lip service to BBC design principles for marketing purposes IMO.

    It is more a problem now with bigger companies and to do with cost savings, as a complex crossover is a lot cheaper than a good drive unit or solid cabinet.
    Last edited by Dr Bunsen Honeydew; 06-07-2011 at 13:52.

  4. #34
    Join Date: May 2011

    Location: Epping

    Posts: 716
    I'm Richard.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tannoy man View Post
    Marco use a high pass filter on the HF Compression Driver and no filter on the
    Bass/Mid it sounds great
    There you go a man who knows. All the gumf was not needed in the first place

  5. #35
    Join Date: Feb 2011

    Location: Wales

    Posts: 8,043
    I'm NotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Bunsen Honeydew View Post
    Companies like Harbeth and Spendor now a days only pay lip service to BBC design principles for marketing purposes IMO.
    I'm so glad you included that.


    Some people have no idea what they're doing and a lot of them are really good at it.
    George Carlin

    Boycott the US

  6. #36
    Join Date: May 2011

    Location: Epping

    Posts: 716
    I'm Richard.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatGig View Post
    I'm so glad you included that.
    I would have thought it was obvious as Marco says. I include it to deflect some of the ignorant shit thrown at me.

  7. #37
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Halifax, UK

    Posts: 1,394
    I'm Nick.

    Default

    There is only one thing better than the best component you can buy, and that is no component at all.
    Assuming that the absense of that component does not cause more damage than the best component that could be used.

    Deciding to improve your sound by not using any speaker cables will not lead to a better sound if the output of the amplifier has to be distant from the loudspeaker.
    Nick.

  8. #38
    Join Date: Aug 2008

    Location: London

    Posts: 2,410
    I'm Nat-andthat'swhyIdrink.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Bunsen Honeydew View Post
    IMO an active crossover is even worse that a passive one, not only do you get the phase problems associated with all filters, but you get the noise of an active circuit (transistor thermal noise) but also you get all the associated power supply problems. It is just more gumf sitting in the signal (music) path to mess it up.
    I hope these phase problems and noise problems have been bourne out through listening and are not just objectivist talk !!

    If YES --> carry on to next post

    NO --> are you sure these problems are real problems to the listener?

  9. #39
    Join Date: Aug 2008

    Location: London

    Posts: 2,410
    I'm Nat-andthat'swhyIdrink.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Bunsen Honeydew View Post
    Musically it can only be done by ear.
    Can I express a small niggle of mine that often pops up on forums? Not aimed at you really Richard, a general point.

    What if you're not listening to music and you want the speakers to portray a sound recording as realistically as possible, a sound recording of non-musical sounds?

    I want speakers that do that and I assume that any musical event will also be portrayed in an equally realistic way without a human emotional brain interfering to make it more musical. and therefore imposing a 'human (western) cultural filter'.

    Am I then forced to go for studio style speakers where no claims are made about musicality or is it all hifi talk and they're the same?

    (out of interest, does any maufacturer claim to do this at all? Harbeth claim to use speech as a listening test but surely that's bandwidth limited realism?)
    Last edited by nat8808; 06-07-2011 at 14:56.

  10. #40
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 14,034
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    How do I use my TRULY WONDERFUL (never heard better speakers in my life) Tannoy Monitor Golds, without any crossovers? Discuss....

    Marco.

    P.S Richard, you have email!
    You could do the next best thing Marco- get a good SET amp to drive the tweeters and go active with a Behringer DCX2496. I'm pretty sure it would sound better than your passive set up.

Closed Thread
Page 4 of 35 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •