+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Word clocks, any experience?

  1. #1
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: North Cambs UK, Earth, Sol, Orion - Cygnus arm of galaxy

    Posts: 11,165
    I'm MadeOfDeadGiantStarsThatExplodedEonsAgo.

    Default Word clocks, any experience?

    Having done a little bit of reading i think i'm beginning to understand why these word clocks can make a good bit of difference to reproduction of digital signals (in my case CD).

    It appears that anything daisy chained in a digital system is going to receive & extract the clock from the data stream & this already has a delay due to extraction & cable length from the source & this is of course the dreaded jitter

    An accurate word clock can syncronize everything as long as equal length cables are used from the word clock itself to all digital components.

    Has anyone here had experience of using one of these? I can only ask
    Bests, Mark



    "We must believe in free will. We have no choice" Isaac Bashevis Singer

  2. #2
    Join Date: Aug 2010

    Location: Montseny National Park, Catalonia

    Posts: 3,254
    I'm John.

    Default

    I’ve not tried one Mark but isn’t it a bit of an overkill for a single Dac and source replay system?

    My understanding is they may be useful for controlling jitter in multiple processing system such a recording studio by acting as a master clock for multiple slave clocks but most Dacs these days have accurate enough clocks for jitter to be negligible.
    If the incoming data is buffered and stacked and clocked out to analogue conversion by the Dac clock rather than the source clock then isn't jitter in the incoming data stream is rectified at the buffer
    If jitter in a two clock set up is a problem then wouldn’t it make mores sense to just get a better Dac with a more accurate clock?
    Idk, maybe the above is only relevant to USB data transfer.

    Intersting though.
    Single spur balanced Mains. Self built music server with 3 seperate linear PSU, Intel i5, 16 GB RAM no hard drive (various Linux OS). Benchmark Dac2 HGC, single ended XLR interconnects/Belkin cable. Exposure 21RC Pre, Super 18 Power (recap & modified). Modded World Audio HD83 HP amp. Hand built Monitors with external crossovers , Volt 250 bass & ABR, Scanspeak 13M8621 Mid & Scanspeak D2905/9300 Hi. HD595 & Beyer 880 (600 ohm) cans.

    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
    -Bertrand Russel

    John.

  3. #3
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: North Cambs UK, Earth, Sol, Orion - Cygnus arm of galaxy

    Posts: 11,165
    I'm MadeOfDeadGiantStarsThatExplodedEonsAgo.

    Default

    Hi John, hope you are well mate

    You should know i'll be going to a three point system, Krell DT10 transport, dCS Purcell upsampler & then to a dCS Delius DAC. That looks a bit like a daisy chain to me

    I'm simply asking, i have no knowledge of these things myself, but from what i have been reading a word clock makes some sense. dCS actually sell one, the Verona

    Now just because i have stepped onto the dCS bandwagon doesn't mean i'm a mug. What i'm wondering is if i can get my Krell DT10 modified with a superior clock & then buffer that & output it to the other kit?

    There is method in my madness, maybe
    Bests, Mark



    "We must believe in free will. We have no choice" Isaac Bashevis Singer

  4. #4
    Join Date: Aug 2010

    Location: Montseny National Park, Catalonia

    Posts: 3,254
    I'm John.

    Default

    Hey Mark, I’m good thanks

    Right, I see Maybe if you’re going to have multiple clocks then there may be some benefit. I have no idea tbh. I’m just going on what I’ve read.

    I must admit I get a bit confused by all digital ailments being blamed on jitter.
    While it may be, from what I understand, a more serious issue using SPDIF it seems like well implemented USB data transfer reduces jitter to really negligible amounts and the problems in fact lie with the analogue stage which tends to get neglected a bit on a great many Dacs
    Looking at various jitter specs for Dacs (if you can find them) and then reading what the experts write concerning what amount of jitter will adversely affect the analogue output. It seems that many USB Dacs achieve what can be considered as negligible jitter
    The problem is, very few people have the equipment to actually measure jitter and any problems just get attributed to it

    Idk mate. I remember when CD players came out and there wasn’t all this concern about jitter then. CD players are just a transport and Dac after all.
    As soon as separate Dacs and computers joined in jitter was what the Hi Fi press used to slag computer audio off with. Strange really.
    Single spur balanced Mains. Self built music server with 3 seperate linear PSU, Intel i5, 16 GB RAM no hard drive (various Linux OS). Benchmark Dac2 HGC, single ended XLR interconnects/Belkin cable. Exposure 21RC Pre, Super 18 Power (recap & modified). Modded World Audio HD83 HP amp. Hand built Monitors with external crossovers , Volt 250 bass & ABR, Scanspeak 13M8621 Mid & Scanspeak D2905/9300 Hi. HD595 & Beyer 880 (600 ohm) cans.

    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
    -Bertrand Russel

    John.

  5. #5
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Wales, UK

    Posts: 321
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reid Malenfant View Post
    Hi John, hope you are well mate

    You should know i'll be going to a three point system, Krell DT10 transport, dCS Purcell upsampler & then to a dCS Delius DAC. That looks a bit like a daisy chain to me

    I'm simply asking, i have no knowledge of these things myself, but from what i have been reading a word clock makes some sense. dCS actually sell one, the Verona

    Now just because i have stepped onto the dCS bandwagon doesn't mean i'm a mug. What i'm wondering is if i can get my Krell DT10 modified with a superior clock & then buffer that & output it to the other kit?

    There is method in my madness, maybe
    Hi Mark

    Does the Krell DT10 have a word clock input?

    If so you can use a clock sync generator to the DT10 and DCS DAC.

    Cheers,
    Mark
    Mark @ Audiocom, Wales UK - 01646 650008

    Website

    Facebook

    Twitter

  6. #6
    Join Date: Apr 2010

    Location: Nergenshuizen, NL

    Posts: 197
    I'm NoLongerActive.

    Default

    Sound on Sound has an article about master clocks
    http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun1...sterclocks.htm

  7. #7
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Wales, UK

    Posts: 321
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vincent Kars View Post
    Sound on Sound has an article about master clocks
    http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun1...sterclocks.htm
    Thanks for the information.

    This article does not cover the real issue of locking the source of the SPDIF to the receiver with a common clock.
    Mark @ Audiocom, Wales UK - 01646 650008

    Website

    Facebook

    Twitter

  8. #8
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Surrey, England UK

    Posts: 591
    I'm Stewart.

    Default

    Hi there;

    Work clock generation is fine except that you will need a very stable source for the clock itself.

    In my studio I use a broadcast SPG (sync. pulse generator) to feed the word clock generator's reference input. The SPG provides a stable reference to 6 decimal places of colour subcarrier (4.433619 Mhz) and thus the clock is extremely stable.

    In professional situations such stability is essential for maintaining absolute sync. across a huge variety of production platforms where a standard speed must always be adhered to - to be honest in the home it could be a little OTT however as you say having all devices locked to a common reference would reduce jitter to a minimum.

    The cost of the above equipment on the second hand market is around £1000-£1500 depending on the type of SPG in use.
    Stewart.

  9. #9
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: North Cambs UK, Earth, Sol, Orion - Cygnus arm of galaxy

    Posts: 11,165
    I'm MadeOfDeadGiantStarsThatExplodedEonsAgo.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Audiocom View Post
    Hi Mark

    Does the Krell DT10 have a word clock input?
    No, but i reckon it shouldn't be too difficult a modification to give it one Effectively it'd be a case of selecting internal or external clock, that may prove to be a tad simplistic though when it come down to it


    Cheers for all the input so far guys I'm keeping an open mind obout it but i definately need to implement an external word clock if i use the Purcell to convert to DSD to feed the Delius. There is a difference between the clock in the Krell & the one in the Delius & this results in a pause in the proceedings every so often (10 minutes or so for a second) where it looks like the Krell plays catch up

    I reckon going over to AES3 will eliminate that as the kit will be receiving the clock from the Krell & locking to it rather than having to run the Delius in master mode & having two slightly different clocks
    Bests, Mark



    "We must believe in free will. We have no choice" Isaac Bashevis Singer

  10. #10
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Surrey, England UK

    Posts: 591
    I'm Stewart.

    Default

    Can you not set the Delius to slave lock to the Krell?
    Stewart.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •