+ Reply to Thread
Page 1134 of 1134 FirstFirst ... 134634103410841124113211331134
Results 11,331 to 11,338 of 11338

Thread: Bargains on ebay? (Part 2)

  1. #11331
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: N E Kent

    Posts: 51,741
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pigmy Pony View Post
    Of course there will be exceptions. Like the Amstrad EX300, from their 'Executive' series.
    Pretty decent if I recall. They didn't pack up until you put at least three watts through them.
    It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!

  2. #11332
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,672
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    I had some similar Amstrads which a mate who lodged with me for a couple of months left behind.

    Used them for a while as surround speakers on my TV system. I used blu-tak to block the holes in the cabs where mice had eaten through at some point in the distant past, must have been stored in a shed or garage.

    As with all Amstrad they eventually went to the skip.

    He also left behind 4 computer monitors, I sold three and kept the Sony Trinitron for myself. That was almost 30 years ago and it still works.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

  3. #11333
    Join Date: Jun 2014

    Location: Chorley Lancs

    Posts: 19,734
    I'm Steve.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    I used blu-tak to block the holes in the cabs where mice had eaten through at some point in the distant past, must have been stored in a shed or garage.
    Amstrad should have known their speakers would end up in a shed, shows a lack of forward thinking. If they'd designed them with reflex ports they could have saved the mice a job. And saved you the price of blu-tak, which must have ruined their appearance somewhat.

    I think Peter Belt wrote an article about the acoustic properties of mouse shit.
    I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in

    T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
    Speakers: KEF Reference 3, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables

    T'other system:
    Echo Dot, Arcam A75 integrated, Monitor Audio R852 MD speakers
    A/V:
    LG OLED65 G56LS, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL T9i sub.


    KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009

  4. #11334
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 7,526
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    Pretty decent if I recall. They didn't pack up until you put at least three watts through them.
    Yes three real watts would blow them as they could only handle 250 watts (PMPO)

  5. #11335
    Join Date: Jul 2009

    Location: Hampshire, UK

    Posts: 3,696
    I'm Adam.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    Usual rule of the thumb is that the more writing there is on the speaker, the worse it will be.

    That rule sits in tandem with the Beobloke 'Shiny dustcap' rule.
    Quite correct. Frequency response graphs on the front panel are also to be regarded with grave suspicion...
    Engineers: fixing problems you didn't know you had in ways you don't understand.

  6. #11336
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,672
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beobloke View Post
    Quite correct. Frequency response graphs on the front panel are also to be regarded with grave suspicion...
    Indeed. I've found a strong correlation between that and them not bothering with a proper crossover.

    There was that weird period from late 70s to early 80s where they took old designs that were absolute tat even ten years previously, dressed them up with some writing, graphs and LEDs to look 'Techy' and then sent them right back out again.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

  7. #11337
    Join Date: Jun 2014

    Location: Chorley Lancs

    Posts: 19,734
    I'm Steve.

    Default

    I sense a bit of Amstrad bashing going on here, and I really don't know why - take this for example, you're getting so much for your 300 quid, to expect it all to work is just nitpicking.



    Bargain prices these days. Checkout this Ebay listing! Description says it "delivers a classic sound quality that is perfect for low-fi enthusiasts". What more could you want?

    https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=...BAgIEAs&adurl=
    I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in

    T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
    Speakers: KEF Reference 3, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables

    T'other system:
    Echo Dot, Arcam A75 integrated, Monitor Audio R852 MD speakers
    A/V:
    LG OLED65 G56LS, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL T9i sub.


    KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009

  8. #11338
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,672
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    I know that well, back in the '90s one of my student lodgers had one. I think it did all work but it was terrible. Truly terrible.

    £299 was quite a lot of money then, too. I suppose at the time it was still the cheapest option if you wanted a rudimentary recording studio, problem was he didn't.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •