+ Reply to Thread
Page 559 of 607 FirstFirst ... 59459509549557558559560561569 ... LastLast
Results 5,581 to 5,590 of 6070

Thread: Anyone keen on watches?

  1. #5581
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default




  2. #5582
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default


  3. #5583
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default


  4. #5584
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default


  5. #5585
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default


  6. #5586
    Join Date: Dec 2013

    Location: Lincoln UK

    Posts: 725
    I'm Mark.

    Default

    Me too!

    Sent from my SM-A356B using Tapatalk
    Life long music lover and Hi-Fi enthusiast for over 40 years, avid live music supporter, dismayed by the current dynamic ticket pricing applied to so many events !!



  7. #5587
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 43,408
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    I like that Spinnaker. Another one I've never heard of.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > Troels Gravesen Faital 3WC-15.

  8. #5588
    Join Date: Jun 2014

    Location: Chorley Lancs

    Posts: 19,403
    I'm Steve.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    In order to achieve chronometer status, a watch must keep time correct to within a minute a month. So your watch keeping time correct to a second a month is remarkable.

    Easily attained with digital watches, but obviously more difficult with mechanical designs.

    BTW, the most accurate time piece one can have is a smartphone!
    When I recently checked my watch against the 'speaking clock' it showed that it had gained seven seconds since Christmas, but I'm thinking i may have originally set it against my smartphone or the telly.

    Anyway, a re-check today against same speaking clock, exactly three weeks later shows it has gained 3 seconds. So roughly a second per week. Not as accurate as I first thought, but still pretty good I think.

    When it comes to engineering, whether it be watches, cars, electronics, Japan really are showing the rest of the world how it's done I think.
    I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in

    T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
    Speakers: KEF Reference 3, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables

    T'other system:
    Echo Dot, Arcam A75 integrated, Monitor Audio R852 MD speakers
    A/V:
    LG OLED65 G56LS, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL T9i sub.


    KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009

  9. #5589
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 37,860
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    The most accurate timekeeper you have is on your smartphone, as it uses the GPS timekeeping to know where you are. The 'speaking clock' is also very good as it is ultimately derived from the atomic clock at the National Physical Laboratory, but there is a very minute delay.
    Barry

  10. #5590
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 12,019
    I'm sorted.

    Default



    (Got ready to leave the house this morning and noticed no watch! But it was so warm couldn’t be bothered to go back upstairs to get one).

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •