+ Reply to Thread
Page 386 of 496 FirstFirst ... 286336376384385386387388396436486 ... LastLast
Results 3,851 to 3,860 of 4957

Thread: Anyone keen on watches?

  1. #3851
    Join Date: Apr 2018

    Location: Gloucestershire

    Posts: 68
    I'm Jim.

    Default

    I've liked the look of them for quite a while and sort of half hankered after one for a while. A little while ago I went to see him for the evening and noticed a MeisterSinger box on the side so mentioned it to him, it turns out he recently bought it but wasn't going to keep it, it was a bit too small for him (he's a big strong bloke) but it fitted much better on my skinny wrist, so it changed hands.

  2. #3852
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 11,080
    I'm sorted.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    Very elegant looking watches: the great majority of which use a leather sprap. No chunky tachymetre controls or excessively thick and heavy diving watches. Like the use of a single hand - I've not seen that before.

    https://www.iguanasell.co.uk/collect...SAAEgJxJfD_BwE
    Expensive novelty watches, style over substance, ok if you only need a rough idea of what the time is.

  3. #3853
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 31,994
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Well, I agree you would need to read the watch more carefully and yet would only have a idea of the time to within 5 - 7 minutes. But for some people (my partner for example) that is quite sufficient. I should have said I'm intrigued by the use of a single hand.

    Still elegant looking.



    Are they the only watch manufacturer to use a such?
    Barry

  4. #3854
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 11,080
    I'm sorted.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    Well, I agree you would need to read the watch more carefully and yet would only have a idea of the time to within 5 - 7 minutes. But for some people (my partner for example) that is quite sufficient. I should have said I'm intrigued by the use of a single hand.

    Still elegant looking.



    Are they the only watch manufacturer to use a such?
    Kind of defeats the object of having an analogue watch if you have to make that much allowance for it's 'shortcomings' but I agree they're quite elegant looking (mind you the one pictured would look better on a matching black strap without any contrasting stitching). And no clearer than this Timex though



    Thinking about it it's like having just a gmt function (4th hand on this Explorer 2 with time indicated on the fixed bezel)



    A quick google reveals there are other single handed watches available, might add one to the collection.

  5. #3855
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,878
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy S View Post
    Kind of defeats the object of having an analogue watch if you have to make that much allowance for it's 'shortcomings' but I agree they're quite elegant looking (mind you the one pictured would look better on a matching black strap without any contrasting stitching). And no clearer than this Timex though



    Thinking about it it's like having just a gmt function (4th hand on this Explorer 2 with time indicated on the fixed bezel)



    A quick google reveals there are other single handed watches available, might add one to the collection.
    Technically not as hard to read as just a GMT as that has to fit 24h within a single sweep but a good analogy.

  6. #3856
    Join Date: Jul 2012

    Location: dunfermline

    Posts: 664
    I'm martin.

    Default

    The minute hand shows the correct time for both hour hands on a gmt so it’s just a case of picking the right hour hand to pair with it.
    Please take good care of your S2k keep it by your side for long and enjoy it from the bottom of your heart and share the quality and legacy of the S2k with many friends so that the legend of the S2k will continue for long. Shigeru Uehara Designer Honda S2000.

  7. #3857
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 31,994
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy S View Post
    Kind of defeats the object of having an analogue watch if you have to make that much allowance for it's 'shortcomings' but I agree they're quite elegant looking (mind you the one pictured would look better on a matching black strap without any contrasting stitching). And no clearer than this Timex though



    Thinking about it it's like having just a gmt function (4th hand on this Explorer 2 with time indicated on the fixed bezel)



    A quick google reveals there are other single handed watches available, might add one to the collection.
    That Timex look nice, but I find your Rolex confusing. The white hands indicate the time is 1:23, yet the orange hand is pointing to 18:20. If it's GMT, it should read 13:20.
    Barry

  8. #3858
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,878
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    That Timex look nice, but I find your Rolex confusing. The white hands indicate the time is 1:23, yet the orange hand is pointing to 18:20. If it's GMT, it should read 13:20.
    I think the GMT allows you to have 2 time zones when travelling, by setting the GMT hour different to the hour hand (but with the minutes being the same).

  9. #3859
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 11,080
    I'm sorted.

    Default

    https://www.everestbands.com/blogs/b...w-to-use-a-gmt

    I've never used this facility, I just reset my watch to local time on the plane.

    Had this lump on today


  10. #3860
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Romford

    Posts: 11,080
    I'm sorted.

    Default

    Willard homage on a nato


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •