+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: OpAmps and specs vs preference

  1. #1
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: London, UK

    Posts: 309

    Default OpAmps and specs vs preference

    Been staring at the Caiman mods and wanting to play opamp rolling I started looking at the various chips mentioned here in the forum and on Farnell's site via their search tool. It got me to wondering if anyone has taken a pseudo-scientific approach to tabulating opamps specs and somehow tried to rate their audio performance (which is subjective).

    This is from the perspective of looking at slew rates, gain, freq, voltage ranges etc. to see if any patterns emerge.

    If no one has, I might try to have a go.

  2. #2
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: London, UK

    Posts: 309

    Default

    Just ordered these from Farnell, initially to meet the minimum £20 credit card order, but most were very cheap (£1-£2 each). Apart from the common ones already mentioned in the various threads I have no idea if the others are safe to use. I will read up, but comments welcome. I wonder what the Burr-Brown ones are like given that they have not been mentioned much here.

    ANALOG DEVICES AD826ANZ
    TEXAS INSTRUMENTS OPA2132PA
    NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LM6132BIN
    BURR-BROWN OPA2228PA
    BURR-BROWN OPA2244PA
    BURR-BROWN OPA2137PA
    ON SEMICONDUCTOR SA5532NG
    TEXAS INSTRUMENTS LT1013CPG4
    TEXAS INSTRUMENTS TL082IPG4

    Will build a spreadsheet at some point soon.

  3. #3
    leo's Avatar
    leo is offline Circuit Junkie & DIY Room Forum Leader
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Notts UK

    Posts: 1,804

    Default

    Should be fun and look forward to your results.

    You've got quite a mixture there, not checked them all but some are fet input and others are bipolar , those types alone tend to sound quite different.
    We won't bother going into all boring stuff, as long as their stable in the circuit it'll be interesting to see what you find
    Things can measure the same but don't always sound the same
    Cheers,
    Leo

  4. #4
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Lancashire, UK

    Posts: 125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Galbavy View Post

    This is from the perspective of looking at slew rates, gain, freq, voltage ranges etc. to see if any patterns emerge.

    If no one has, I might try to have a go.
    As Leo says, you will have fun playing... But specs aren't everything - The humble NE5532 can sound very good and is well down the spec sheet. In my experience of opamp rolling the LM4562 (plastic or metal) will take a lot of beating - It was after all designed for audio, unlike some chips (eg. the THS4032) which are intended for video applications.

    Just watch out for stability issues as Leo mentions - the THS4032 is particularly bad tempered and can cause some frustration.

    I do like the AD826 and have stuck with it in my TC-7520 (with DAC upgrade) - Analog Devices chips do seem to have their own kind of sound - Quite unlike the Burr-Brown's.

    In the end it's what YOUR ears prefer - Just have fun and give each chip a few minutes to warm up settle.

    Ken
    __________________________________
    "Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not"
    - Albert Einstein.
    __________________________________

  5. #5
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: London, UK

    Posts: 309

    Default

    I agree that specs are not everything but I am curious if there are any commonalities...

  6. #6
    Join Date: Feb 2009

    Location: Lancashire, UK

    Posts: 125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Galbavy View Post
    I agree that specs are not everything but I am curious if there are any commonalities...
    Good luck on that - I'll look forward to your findings.

    Ken
    __________________________________
    "Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not"
    - Albert Einstein.
    __________________________________

  7. #7
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Cheshire UK

    Posts: 198
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    NE5532 from TI is at the moment my favourite dual opamp in a purely analogue applications. I've found that it sounds more natural than LM4562 and the like. For a single opamp there is a better one - NE5534.

    Alex

  8. #8
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: London, UK

    Posts: 309

    Default

    Well, first package with 8 pairs of opamps turned up yesterday and I have a ship notice for the last pair also - I guess they were in a backroom box somewhere

    I have printed out the datasheets for material to digest and will slowly put together a table of specs. In terms of the electronics side I am a neophyte, so time to read up on everything from scratch again (last time was maybe 25 years ago).

    I hope I get time to play this weekend but with a friends BBQ on the casrd this may be difficult.

  9. #9
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: London, UK

    Posts: 309

    Default

    While attempting to study the basics I came across this book online:

    http://www.analog.com/library/analog..._handbook.html

    It's the PDFs by chapter of Analog Devices publication described as: "Op Amp Applications Handbook, edited by Walt Jung (Newnes, 2006), comprises Op Amp Basics, Specialty Amplifiers, Using Op Amps with Data Converters, Sensor Signal Conditioning, Analog Filters, Signal Amplifiers, Hardware and Housekeeping Techniques, and Op Amp History. As the name implies, it covers the application of op amps, but does so on a broader scope. It also covers a host of closely related design topics, making it a formidable toolkit for the analog designer."

    Chapter 1 - so far - is very readable and the chapter on op amp history is also very good and appears to be where all the pics and text on the Wikipedia article comes from.

  10. #10
    Join Date: Jun 2009

    Location: Yonkers, NY USA

    Posts: 165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Galbavy View Post
    I agree that specs are not everything but I am curious if there are any commonalities...
    The OPA2132 got alot of play on quite a few 7520s here. By the way, the TI OPA2132 *IS* the Burr Brown OPA2132. TI and Burr Brown merged (or TI bought Burr Brown) in 2000.


    When i had OPA2132 in my setup, i found it to be laid back with musical timing, really really good with vocals, seducively so even, and a slightly monophonic soundstage, compared to the LM4562. I came away with the impression that the OPA2132 was the one for voice, but the LM4562 was better with instruments. The OP2132 was a very relaxing chip

    CD
    David

    iTunes 7,PowerMac G4 733, Mac OS X 10.4.11, Airport Express, Beresford TC-7520 (Dual LM4562NAs) MLC5/6 clipped, 36K and 100nf cap mod, Behringer EP2000, Cambridge Soundworks Tower II

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •