Barry, Marco: As the cartridge I sent off to Soundsmith had 1000 hours on it and I already had another in use with minimal hours, I wasn't really that concerned.
Nonetheless, I did share your trepidation with respect to going to the line contact stylus and losing that "Denon" or conical stylus magic.
I'll admit that with a small minority of recordings (maybe 10 per cent) the increased high frequency extension with the line contact can tilt the tonal balance up a bit and be a bit excessive. In that sense, the conical stylus is "more forgiving" of less than stellar recordings; you'll get no argument from me there.
But on the vast majority of recordings the LC'd Denon simply sounds significantly better through the midband and lower frequencies as well. Ironically, though, it is most notable in the midband where, on many recordings, the line contact stylus simply reveals information that the conical is not just presenting with "less detail" but missing entirely. The LC has an ability to unravel complex passages and not get bogged down or congested which, once you've heard the LC you realize the Denon conical is doing in full force.
And, as I said, all of this happens without the loss of the musicality and overall coherence that many users value with the Denons. Provided, of course, you get the setup right and, as much as it needs to be "right" with the conical, the LC is even more unforgiving of improper setup with respect to VTA and VTF.
Do it! You will not be disappointed!


Reply With Quote


Originally Posted by horace


