Originally Posted by
Gordon Steadman
If John has offered a full refund after return of the amp I don't think such an offer should be refused no matter what has gone on before.
I was greatly surprised that anyone would accept copies of emails as proof of anything. Those and indeed, official looking court papers, could be produced very easily indeed these days. I could do it easily. Eastbourne court records are not available on line so it would be hard to double check the whole thing. Again, this is not to doubt anyone's word, just making the point.
Strange about the remote control which seems to be highlighted as a complaint when the man has never made such a thing.
I reckon it would be best to write this whole thing off as a misunderstanding. Allow the amp to be collected and accept the refund. The time comes when you just have to trust someone.
