+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 715

Thread: Could this be a 'giant-killing' tonearm cable?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by REXTON View Post
    The filigree detail that you mention is all well and good but I want to HEAR what's on the record and not have the thing glossed over by a wave of discolouration.
    Interesting comment, Andy. What I heard with Marco's 423.5 'special' in my system was a combination of great wealth of detail within a fantastic (and I mean strongly better than with my Dynavector cable) soundstage with greater width, depth and, intriguingly, height. The sense of a real space with dimensionality was palpable and all three of us heard it clearly.

    Now, I think that there is an important symbiosis going on with tonearm cable, SUT, and interconnect to phono preamp; in fact, I think this is critical to success. So in my case, the 423.5 'special', Choir Audio SUT-H7 and Tellurium Q Black worked very well together although Marco preferred the G1000HD/WBT in the latter position. I have ordered a 223.5/WBT to compare with the TQ and get the very best symbiosis I can achieve.

    As for your comment about valves, bear in mind that my system is all solid-state, so I'm not sure that the chosen technology is a factor.
    Last edited by MartinT; 14-06-2012 at 14:35.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •