Well Yammy sold the plant that made that technology a very long time ago.
Yes I'm sure by making a speaker enclosure that really could do justice to the internals, redesigns the x/over points so that the tweeter actually worked within in then performance parameters, careful construction of the x/over using parts now available (telfon caps, bybee's and trick air coils etc), and even updating the main bass driver to one that had a chance of matching the cone acceleration of the Be unit), mating to pair of stands worthy of all the lavishment, care and attention and you may have pair of speakers worth an earwig (possibly)
Now that mid range Be cone you mentioned, TAD possibly?
Tell how good Usher are then please, I'm all for a great story but I am good listener!
How high is that horse and do you need a ladder to get down?
Now the other burning question is can you fit a aftermarket word clock to a rats ass? will it mind?, will improve it its hand to eye co-ordination or possibly with the view to it's pre cursorsy post amble, with a class leading match toit's leading square wave form with no post echo or ringing, will it then reconstruct data stream to manage a total jitter quotiant of less than 0.0004 PPB? (before the quatiazation filter) find out on the next exciting episode of will my Krell handle a dylithum transplant without a level 10 force field in operation. on audiophile soap The cleaning substance you can believe in.
Take us deeper into the combat zone number 1............................
Just being a like playful this evening (can't help it the hormoans you see)
Reply With Quote