I've started looking into redesigning my Garrard 301 plinth. I have one simple question and would just like a consensus of opinion. My objective is to limit vibration getting into the headshell. My intentions as stated in the thread title are to decople the motor from the Garrard 301 and use a seperate arm pod. What it be fair to say that by using both techniques, it should maximise the chances of vibration getting into the cartridge? Sounds like the answer is pretty obvious but I would like comments and input from you guys.

Many thanks, Andy.