+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54

Thread: MCRU Ultimate Mk. III Cables

  1. #41
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,454
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    My comments weren't aimed solely at you, Richard. You just chipped in when the thread had already, as Dave (Thing Fish) said 'decended into the usual sniping and digging about mains cables'.

    They were aimed at everyone whose posts here contributed to the above situation. Alan S has a particular penchant for 'poking' those who can hear the differences made by using 'fancy mains cables', whenever he sees an opportunity to do so, just because he can't hear what those people can, and it has to stop. He is also not alone in that respect.

    It's very important on this forum that anyone who wants to eulogise about or express their pleasure/excitement about the effect of their new mains cables (or anything else related to improving their hi-fi system), can do so without folk 'raining on their parade', as it were.

    Now I know that Martin is a big boy and can look after himself, but the behaviour I'm referring to above sends out the wrong message on AoS, which must always be remembered is primarily a subjectivist forum, and it may prevent others, not as thick-skinned as Martin, expressing their delight or posting their impressions of the improvements a new mains lead (or whatever) has made to their system - and I simply will not allow that.

    As I've said before, we don't gag people here, so if anyone wants to be as critical as they like (within the boundaries of respect and decency) about the efficacy of mains cables, then ensure that it is done either on a thread started specifically for that purpose, or on one already started by someone else, relating to that topic, and NOT on a thread such as this.

    I do hope that I've made myself clear and do not have to issue bans to offenders (which I will do in future, if this happens again), in order to get the message across about the kind behaviour that is expected here.

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & regulator mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat with Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight. Isonoe feet & boots. Ortofon RS-212D tonearm with Denon DL-103GL, in a Denon PCL-300 headshell, fitted with Funk Firm Houdini and Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp and Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp, fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.

  2. #42
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: Surrey

    Posts: 4,157
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanS View Post
    Nothing wrong at all, I see no reason why a bit of mains wire will make a difference over a low current thing like a HiFi. I don't expect it to be different and it isn't, saves a whole load of cash and time. You guys who just trust your ears are enjoying them cables great. I trust mine and hear nothing.

    Signal cables that is IC and speakers will make a difference due to their construction differences on low voltage signals, 240v is another story.

    Enjoy your purchases Mike.

    Note people, environments and systems are different so what one person experiences isn't by another.
    Everywhere I've tried then has been successful.
    Can't remember if we had fuses or circuit breakers before the house was refurbed.
    TAD CD / DAC / Pre, Technics 1210, MCRU PSU, Mike New Bearing & Platter, Stillpoints LP1 weight, Speedy Steve Ebony armboard, Fidelity Research FR64FX arm, Ortofon SPU. Aurorasound VIDA Phono Pre Amp, TAD Power Amp, TAD E1 speakers. Coherent RTZ 3 Grounding box, Coherent grounding cables, Creaktiv racks. Coherent Mains Cables. SR Blue Fuse. Interconnects : Coherent and Yannis 223.5 Connect Litz. Coherent speaker cable. Audio Magic Transcendence Conditioner. Coherent mains socket. Mains Filters : , PS Audio Harvesters, Russ Andrews Purifiers, Tacima, Vertex. Black Ravioli and RDC supports. Electric Beach S1NX platforms for TAD CD and Technics. Ferrite chokes everywhere except the above. Ears, brain

    Mike

  3. #43
    Join Date: Jul 2013

    Location: Kingsbury, NW London

    Posts: 1,235
    I'm Clive.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinT View Post
    Having performed some extended listening now I shall write up my thoughts into a proper mini-review and place it in Strokes of Genius.
    Martin I do really look forward to reading your review.
    SOURCE: SME12A Turntable with SME Series V tonearm/Hana Umami Red, or Audio Technica AT-OC9XSH, PS Audio Stellar Phonostage, Shanling CD 80MkII, OPPO UDP-205 BluRay, SkyQ.
    AMPLIFIER: Bryston BR-20 Pre/DAC/Streamer & Bryston 4B3 Power Amplifier
    SPEAKERS: Spendor D7 on Iso-Acoustics Gaia Neo III’s
    HEADPHONES: OPPO PM-1 with Atlas Zeno cable, B&W Pi8.
    CABLES: Analogue: Speaker: Atlas Mavros Grun. Interconnect - Atlas Mavros XLR x3.
    Digital:Audioquest Carbon Ethernet x 4, Audioquest Carbon digital x2, English Electric 8 Switch, Chord Optichord, Atlas Optical.
    Mains: PS Audio Perfectwave AC-05 x 7, Isol-8 Powerline Extreme with Quantum Science yellow fuse on input cable, Sounds Fantastic 6way Mains Blocks.
    ACCESSORIES: Keith Monks Prodigy+ RCM
    STORAGE: Synology DS216J NAS with 2 x 3Tb WD Red hard-drives. Samsung 500Gb SSD.
    TV LG55B7 OLED

  4. #44
    Join Date: Jul 2009

    Location: Hampshire, UK

    Posts: 3,687
    I'm Adam.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldpinkman View Post
    And whilst I'm here kettle leads with a notch are rated to 13 amps. Standard iecs for hifi only the 10 amps I quoted.
    No they're not. They are both rated to 10A but the C15/16 type that has the notch is temperature rated to 120degC compared to the 70degC of the standard C13/14 type.
    Engineers: fixing problems you didn't know you had in ways you don't understand.

  5. #45
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Wythall, Worcestershire, UK

    Posts: 798
    I'm Alan.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    My comments weren't aimed solely at you, Richard. You just chipped in when the thread had already, as Dave (Thing Fish) said 'decended into the usual sniping and digging about mains cables'.

    They were aimed at everyone whose posts here contributed to the above situation. Alan S has a particular penchant for 'poking' those who can hear the differences made by using 'fancy mains cables', whenever he sees an opportunity to do so, just because he can't hear what those people can, and it has to stop. He is also not alone in that respect.

    It's very important on this forum that anyone who wants to eulogise about or express their pleasure/excitement about the effect of their new mains cables (or anything else related to improving their hi-fi system), can do so without folk 'raining on their parade', as it were.

    Now I know that Martin is a big boy and can look after himself, but the behaviour I'm referring to above sends out the wrong message on AoS, which must always be remembered is primarily a subjectivist forum, and it may prevent others, not as thick-skinned as Martin, expressing their delight or posting their impressions of the improvements a new mains lead (or whatever) has made to their system - and I simply will not allow that.

    As I've said before, we don't gag people here, so if anyone wants to be as critical as they like (within the boundaries of respect and decency) about the efficacy of mains cables, then ensure that it is done either on a thread started specifically for that purpose, or on one already started by someone else, relating to that topic, and NOT on a thread such as this.

    I do hope that I've made myself clear and do not have to issue bans to offenders (which I will do in future, if this happens again), in order to get the message across about the kind behaviour that is expected here.

    Marco.
    Marco

    Just to give you the courtesy of confirming I have read this post. Its your forum and you can make whatever rules or requirements that please you.

    BTW as points of fact I have never used the term 'fancy mains cables'. Don't take my word for it all you or anyone else interested has to do is a site search for the word fancy and my username = result zero. Fancy is your term not mine. I am sure you can appreciate I resent being accused of something I haven't done/don't do.

    "whenever he sees an opportunity to do so, just because he can't hear what those people can" I comment on mains cables threads as the exception not whenever as you state. Again use search and see how often threads with the subject of mains cables get posted and my username does not make a post on that thread. Don't take my word for it.

    Is there an point in asking you to kindly not damn me with these inaccurate beliefs that you hold???

    Logging off for a few days

  6. #46
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Wythall, Worcestershire, UK

    Posts: 798
    I'm Alan.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeMusic View Post
    Everywhere I've tried then has been successful.
    Can't remember if we had fuses or circuit breakers before the house was refurbed.
    Thanks for your post but I cannot discuss it any more see Marco's post above and my response.

  7. #47
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: fuck off

    Posts: 2,030
    I'm fuckoff.

    Default


  8. #48
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,454
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanS View Post
    Marco

    Just to give you the courtesy of confirming I have read this post. Its your forum and you can make whatever rules or requirements that please you.

    BTW as points of fact I have never used the term 'fancy mains cables'. Don't take my word for it all you or anyone else interested has to do is a site search for the word fancy and my username = result zero. Fancy is your term not mine. I am sure you can appreciate I resent being accused of something I haven't done/don't do.

    "whenever he sees an opportunity to do so, just because he can't hear what those people can" I comment on mains cables threads as the exception not whenever as you state. Again use search and see how often threads with the subject of mains cables get posted and my username does not make a post on that thread. Don't take my word for it.

    Is there an point in asking you to kindly not damn me with these inaccurate beliefs that you hold???

    Logging off for a few days
    Alan, I know that you haven't used the term 'fancy mains cables', hence why I put it in inverted commas. I used it simply as a generic term to describe what is considered by some as 'foo' (those who feel that simple 'kettle leads' are good enough to power their equipment), which, based on your comments to date on this forum about the matter, is a category you appear to fit into. In that respect, I could've also used the term 'foo mains leads', even though, to my knowledge, you haven't used that term yourself either.

    Therefore, I'm not accusing you of the above. Furthermore, I also know that you don't comment on every single mains cable thread, but you do turn up on a few of them, and it's always to say the same old thing (that you can't hear any difference with using audiophile-designed mains cables) [that description is mine, not yours]. I'm sorry, but whether you realise it or not, you do come across as having a bit of a bee in your bonnet about this subject, and so seem to enjoy being the voice of dissent.

    Now that's absolutely fine on a general thread about mains cables, where you're entitled to your opinion the same as anyone else, but NOT on a thread such as this where someone has purchased some new mains cables and wants to relate to like-minded enthusiasts the details of their experience. In that situation, the only comments that are acceptable are those either congratulating the OP on his purchase, perhaps by someone who already uses the same cables and knows how good they are, or by those who want to know more details about them, with a view to buying some themselves.

    It is NOT acceptable for anyone to 'thread crap' the discussion by adding input that has nothing to do with what the OP wants to discuss - and judging by his comments, it is clear that Martin didn't appreciate such input. If you want to tell everyone about how much a waste of money and how ineffective/unnecessary you think 'fancy mains cables' are, then start a separate thread about it. It's as simple as that, which is all I am asking you (or anyone else) here to do.

    It is essentially the same rule as we apply on private or trade sales threads. It is applied simply as a matter of courtesy and to ensure that the best interests of the OP are met.

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & regulator mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat with Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight. Isonoe feet & boots. Ortofon RS-212D tonearm with Denon DL-103GL, in a Denon PCL-300 headshell, fitted with Funk Firm Houdini and Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp and Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp, fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.

  9. #49
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Huddersfield

    Posts: 3,358
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    Alan, I know that you haven't used the term 'fancy mains cables', hence why I put it in inverted commas. I used it simply as a generic term to describe what is considered by some as 'foo' (those who feel that simple 'kettle leads' are good enough to power their equipment), which, based on your comments to date on this forum about the matter, is a category you appear to fit into. In that respect, I could've also used the term 'foo mains leads', even though, to my knowledge, you haven't used that term yourself either.

    Therefore, I'm not accusing you of the above. Furthermore, I also know that you don't comment on every single mains cable thread, but you do turn up on a few of them, and it's always to say the same old thing (that you can't hear any difference with using audiophile-designed mains cables) [that description is mine, not yours]. I'm sorry, but whether you realise it or not, you do come across as having a bit of a bee in your bonnet about this subject, and so seem to enjoy being the voice of dissent.

    Now that's absolutely fine on a general thread about mains cables, where you're entitled to your opinion the same as anyone else, but NOT on a thread such as this where someone has purchased some new mains cables and wants to relate to like-minded enthusiasts the details of their experience. In that situation, the only comments that are acceptable are those either congratulating the OP on his purchase, perhaps by someone who already uses the same cables and knows how good they are, or by those who want to know more details about them, with a view to buying some themselves.

    It is NOT acceptable for anyone to 'thread crap' the discussion by adding input that has nothing to do with what the OP wants to discuss - and judging by his comments, it is clear that Martin didn't appreciate such input. If you want to tell everyone about how much a waste of money and how ineffective/unnecessary you think 'fancy mains cables' are, then start a separate thread about it. It's as simple as that, which is all I am asking you (or anyone else) to do.

    It is essentially the same rule as we apply on private or trade sales threads - and it is applied simply as a matter of courtesy.

    Marco.

  10. #50
    Join Date: May 2009

    Location: gone away

    Posts: 4,870
    I'm joe.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    but NOT on a thread such as this where someone has purchased some new mains cables and wants to relate to like-minded enthusiasts the details of their experience. In that situation, the only comments that are acceptable are those either congratulating the OP on his purchase, perhaps by someone who already uses the same cables and knows how good they are, or by those who want to know more details about them, with a view to buying some themselves.
    Really? So if (as has happened in the past) I buy and try something and don't like the results, does that mean I'm not allowed to express a contrary opinion to someone who has had positive results with the same item?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •