+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Digital Coax

  1. #1
    Join Date: Feb 2011

    Location: Jersey, Channel Islands

    Posts: 362
    I'm Darren.

    Default Digital Coax

    Hi All,

    Has anyone tried the Mark Grant G1000HD digital coax against Beresford's TRC-222? Or does anyone have any other suggestions.

    Regards,

    Darren

  2. #2
    Join Date: Feb 2011

    Location: England

    Posts: 290
    I'm James.

    Default

    Please don't shoot me but i have had excellent results with 'Aerial Cable' (it is designed for 75 Ohm use) terminated in half decent RCA plugs or BNC's.

    James.

  3. #3
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: North Cambs UK, Earth, Sol, Orion - Cygnus arm of galaxy

    Posts: 11,166
    I'm MadeOfDeadGiantStarsThatExplodedEonsAgo.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimC View Post
    Please don't shoot me but i have had excellent results with 'Aerial Cable' (it is designed for 75 Ohm use) terminated in half decent RCA plugs or BNC's.

    James.
    I'd suggest you upgrade to satelite coax Every standard TV aerial coax i have seen has had the most p*ss poor outer screen it's just now worth talking about. Satelite coax like CT100 or it's equivalent has a screen of slightly more coverage than TV coax but also has an aluminised foil which gives total coverage.

    Apologies Darren as i can't help you with the comparisons
    Bests, Mark



    "We must believe in free will. We have no choice" Isaac Bashevis Singer

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •