Audiolab 6000a

[wee tee cee]

Bought the 6000cdp and was pleasently suprised....proper bit of hifi at reasonable money .


Took the plunge on the 6000a.


Dac/hpa and 50ws of grunt as a intergrated.

Havent been dissapointed.

works really well with efficient speakers, Reiver acoustic eddingdales mk1 and 2 are tremendous.

Less so with 57s.....driven hard amp had a wee huff.

Sounds good on electric beach frugels...lovely soundsage.

Dac to my ears sounds best on the slow filter.

HPA is very good with my 650/700 senns.

Have ripped my BMU/Cabling out the main rig to let it sing.....very impressed!!!!!

[Gazjam]

Soopa Doopa

Audiolabs knocking it out the park with their latest Gear.
I STILL don’t know how good the CD Transport is,
everything I do with it it just keeps stepping up.

[Floyddroid]

Soopa Doopa

Audiolabs knocking it out the park with their latest Gear.
I STILL don’t know how good the CD Transport is,
everything I do with it it just keeps stepping up.

Well chuffed with mine too Gaz

[wee tee cee]

Have tried it as a pre with a EWA M50 and croft 7.

Impedance mismatch with the Croft....

As an integrated its rather impressive.

CD playback system the CDT/6000A pick your wires and speakers....something efficient.

Proper plug and play CD system.

[JohnJo]

Great amp at the price, I tried it when I auditioned my Wharfedale speakers. It prompted me to buy the 8300XP power amp which is a cracker too, a serious piece of kit for the money.

[wee tee cee]

im thinking about both the power amp and the mono blocks.

The 6000a is a cracking digital front end.

[Stratmangler]

works really well with efficient speakers, Reiver acoustic eddingdales mk1 and 2 are tremendous.

Less so with 57s.....driven hard amp had a wee huff.

Sounds good on electric beach frugels...lovely soundsage.

That's because electrostatics require serious current to produce high frequencies at high volume.
The impedance gets lower with rising frequency.
There are many amps out there that would struggle with electrostatics at high volume.

[Floyddroid]

Great amp at the price, I tried it when I auditioned my Wharfedale speakers. It prompted me to buy the 8300XP power amp which is a cracker too, a serious piece of kit for the money.

I was interested in the 8300XP too. Makes you wondwe how much better the monoblocks are or indeed worth the extra?

[JohnJo]

I was interested in the 8300XP too. Makes you wondwe how much better the monoblocks are or indeed worth the extra?

I’ve never heard the monoblocks. My understanding is that each is similar to a single stereo amp running in bridged mono mode, utilising two amplifier boards in true balanced operation. I tried my amp in bridged mode compared to stereo mode into a single speaker and preferred normal stereo operation. Damping factor is halved in bridged mode AFAIK. If I needed the high power I’d probably bi-amp with two stereo amps. The stereo amp has tons of power though.
The monoblocks may well sound better using the balanced inputs rather than rca. The stereo amp sounds better on the rca inputs. Another tip for the stereo amp is use the outside sets of speaker terminals as the inner ones use internal links and don’t sound as good.

[wee tee cee]

That's because electrostatics require serious current to produce high frequencies at high volume.
The impedance gets lower with rising frequency.
There are many amps out there that would struggle with electrostatics at high volume.

Fortunately no majik smoke appeared...the amp must have a shutdown feature when over worked.

Strange the 57s were fine with t amps and valves.....some SS amps literally go up in smoke with them.