+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: Major sound upgrade

  1. #11
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 32,048
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tapid View Post
    Did notice the other day that my DM 2 speakers are round the wrong way ( don't mean back to front, lol ). Thats according to the Bowers handbook, who say there s a left and right way to place em. Am I likely to notice an improvement if I swap them around ? . Only bought a few weeks ago, and there heavy. Most impressed with these btw.
    Note to self..... try it and find out !
    The drive units of the DM2 are not aligned vertically, so the speakers are 'handed'. The left hand speaker has the badge on the left and the right-hand speaker has its badge on the right. This arrangement places the tweeters at the extreme left and right respectively, and outside of the woofer. If however the speakers are placed far apart from one another then B&W advise the speakers are reversed so the tweeters now lay inside of the woofers.

    https://www.bowerswilkins.com/sites/...DM2_manual.pdf
    Barry

  2. #12
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: N E Kent

    Posts: 51,625
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    It's not unheard of for the DM2 to be used upside down.
    It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!

  3. #13
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 32,048
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    It's not unheard of for the DM2 to be used upside down.
    Yes, on most speakers one expects the woofers to lay below the mid and tweeter units. Can't say I have ever tried using my DM2s 'upside down'.
    Barry

  4. #14
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: N E Kent

    Posts: 51,625
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    Not sure I'd try it on Ditton 66s or TLS80s.
    It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!

  5. #15
    Join Date: Nov 2013

    Location: HAMPSTEAD

    Posts: 1,156
    I'm brian.

    Default

    Thanks guys. Have them sitting on Shan shimna concrete speaker stands with a heavy slab of concrete in between as well, lol. But sound better
    now there at ear level. concrete is better than wood or metal under speakers I would say. Big effortless sound, wonderful.
    Sorry for thread drift.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Jan 2021

    Location: Avening UK

    Posts: 48
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    I've got a woofer coming tomorrow, can I wire that up wrong... ? 😀

  7. #17
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Norfolk, UK

    Posts: 6,209
    I'm BigBobJoylove.

    Default

    Sounds like it.

    Ben Duncan mains conditioner
    2022 MacBook Pro 14" M1 Pro 10/16/16/16
    Samsung QE75Q90T 75" QLED TV
    XMOS DSD Async USB to Coax converter
    RME Audio ADI-2 FS (AK4493) DAC
    Chord Clearway XLR interconnects
    Audioquest Crimson USB interconnect
    QED Quartz Reference optical interconnect
    Edifier S3000 Pro active speakers
    Atacama SE24 stands

  8. #18
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,882
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    Yes, on most speakers one expects the woofers to lay below the mid and tweeter units. Can't say I have ever tried using my DM2s 'upside down'.
    Didn't Mission make a big deal about their unique upside down placement of the drive units to aid time alignment, when B&W had done it years before??

    Sent from my BKL-L09 using Tapatalk

  9. #19
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,882
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    Not sure I'd try it on Ditton 66s or TLS80s.
    I wouldn't bother with Tannoy DCs either

    Sent from my BKL-L09 using Tapatalk

  10. #20
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,932
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawrence001 View Post
    Didn't Mission make a big deal about their unique upside down placement of the drive units to aid time alignment, when B&W had done it years before??

    Sent from my BKL-L09 using Tapatalk
    I thought that was something to do with baffle step response?

    In the 1980s I had some Fisher speakers with the tweeter on the bottom, so it wasn't just Mission and B&W.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •