+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 103 of 103

Thread: Neurochrome Modulus-686

  1. #101
    Join Date: May 2018

    Location: Woking

    Posts: 803
    I'm Chris.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    Thanks Chris.

    This is the amp. I'm sure it will make some nice noises.

    Chair has seen many a fine piece of hardware.....

    Alan's never sat in it though
    System 1: - Amp - Musical Paradise MP-701 mk2 - Neurochrome 686
    - Source: Audio Technica LP-5 - Custom 6V6 stage - Novafidelity X30 - Soekris 1421 (LPSU) - Custom TDA1541 C3G DAC -
    - Speakers: Martin Logan Prodigy's - Subs: - REL T3's -

    System 2 - Amp: Musical Paradise MP 303/Custom 300B SET - Custom 6SL7 Pre -
    - Source: Pioneer N-30K - SONCOZ SGD1 -
    - Speakers: Loth X BS1's - Sub: REL T3 -

  2. #102
    Join Date: Apr 2010

    Location: Bristol, since 1978. Current house since 1996!

    Posts: 909
    I'm Chris.

    Default

    Music sounds great via my Opera Consonance horns, via an 86 version.
    Chris.

  3. #103
    Join Date: Aug 2020

    Location: Lincolnshire

    Posts: 45
    I'm Zander.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    Sorry Kevin, I think I should have used the word Character rather than soul, I was trying to convey the fact it has very little imprint on the sound of its own ie it is invisible in the music chain because of its low distortion and neutrality, in effect it is doing an almost perfect job as i think Peter Walker once quoted "a straight wire with gain"
    This comment has cleared up the confusion I suffered whilst reading your blog, then seeing the "soulless" comment here. You are right that there was a better choice of description available.

    I have read back through here and seen a suggestion from Strider5 that it was an attack on Jimbo? It was not intended as such and I regret it was seen that way.

    Wherever your blog is posted or wherever you post It is in the public domain. It is my right that I can question what I read. If that be on Art of Sound, or anywhere else. My goal was to understand why there was a difference in your opinion on Art of Sound vs. what you had posted on audio addicts. Not to question your experience of listening and comparing.

    As I see now it was just a bad phrase to use and your opinion was more consistent across the forums.

    I am glad this has been cleared up.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •