+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: High end / Cutting edge , Opinions please

  1. #11
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Seaton, Devon, UK

    Posts: 13,260
    I'm Adrian.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pharos View Post
    I think the use of computer evolution as a parallel is probably not quite appropriate because I regard PCs as on the whole cheapish junk.

    I agree that in general high end stuff is better built with better components, and often under run, ie. capable of a greater demand than is being placed on them.
    Sorry but the evolution of mobile phones, and chip technology used in the computer industry and other related technologies, is primarily what has enabled and driven other market areas such as the hifi digital arena and modern sound systems, and virtually anything else technically driven you can think of. Computers and PC may appear to be cheapish/junk externally but the internal processors and chips(storage) in them is very sophisticated, it is only cheap due to very high volumes of production.
    Listening is the act of aural discrimination and dissemination of sound, and accepting you get it wrong sometimes.

    Analog Inputs: Pro-Ject Signature 10 TT & arm, Benz Micro LP-S, Michel Cusis MC, Goldring 2500 and Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridges, Hitachi FT5500 mk2 Tuner

    Digital:- Marantz SA-KI Pearl CD player, RaspberryPi/HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, Buffalo NAS Drive

    Amplification:- AudioValve Sunilda phono stage, Krell KSP-7B pre-amp, Krell KSA-80 power amp

    Output: Wilson Benesch Vector speakers, KLH Ultimate One Headphones

    Cables: Tellurium Q Ultra Black II RCA & Chord Epic 2 RCA, various speaker leads, & links


    I think I am nearing audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cheltenham

    Posts: 982
    I'm Charlie.

    Default

    Allen,
    The key issue about the Burmester, which you have been eyeing is not the SQ. A high end CD player from that era will sound great, as that era spawned some of the great CD players. But I would be worried about spares and serviceability. It may be that Burmester have put aside plenty of spares, like Studer and Telefunken did for their R2R studio machines. But if there are no spares, this could potentially be a very expensive door stop.
    Charlie
    R2R: Studer A820 1/2 inch 2 track; Otari MTR-12 1/4 inch 2 track; Sony APR 5003; Sony APR 5002; Studer A807/II. Vinyl: Platine Verdier Allaerts MC1B/Schroeder Reference & Model 2 Decca C4E/Hadcock 228 TRON Seven Reference phono. Keith Monks MkII RCM Other analogue source: Nakamichi Dragon with ANT4066 mods. Amplification: TRON Meteor preamp TRON Voyager 20B SET power. Speakers: Avantgarde Duo. Digital: computing at last with Prism Sound Lyra 2 A2D converter

  3. #13
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Brighton, UK.

    Posts: 3,093
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Does it really matter? Just pretend its 2003 and you got the best money can buy.
    Current system 1210 GR. CDP - Meridian G08. Amp -Sugden A21I - Sig. Wharfedale Lintons.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,877
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikeandvan View Post
    Does it really matter? Just pretend its 2003 and you got the best money can buy.
    No, I'm going to pretend that it's 1979. that was a much better year.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Brighton, UK.

    Posts: 3,093
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    No, I'm going to pretend that it's 1979. that was a much better year.
    For music? One of the best.
    Current system 1210 GR. CDP - Meridian G08. Amp -Sugden A21I - Sig. Wharfedale Lintons.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Seaford UK

    Posts: 1,861
    I'm Dennis.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJSki2fly View Post
    Sorry but the evolution of mobile phones, and chip technology used in the computer industry and other related technologies, is primarily what has enabled and driven other market areas such as the hifi digital arena and modern sound systems, and virtually anything else technically driven you can think of. Computers and PC may appear to be cheapish/junk externally but the internal processors and chips(storage) in them is very sophisticated, it is only cheap due to very high volumes of production.
    I agree that the evolution involving high sales rates in things has increased massively investment, and resultantly in design improvement, notably in mobile phones. The best part of the PCs IMO are probably the chips, which may well be used in many other devices.

    However, someone said earlier that CD quality was so good distortion and noise wise, that little improvement was possible, and I don't think that much progress has been made in CD players, especially now that they have lost their primacy as a source.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,689
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by topoxforddoc View Post
    Allen,
    The key issue about the Burmester, which you have been eyeing is not the SQ. A high end CD player from that era will sound great, as that era spawned some of the great CD players. But I would be worried about spares and serviceability. It may be that Burmester have put aside plenty of spares, like Studer and Telefunken did for their R2R studio machines. But if there are no spares, this could potentially be a very expensive door stop.
    Charlie
    Agree with this. I’d also point out that whilst components used may be of high quality, caps are caps and resistors are resistors and as such are prone to failure after a period of time. Film caps should be fine, ‘lytics can be another matter.

    Nowt that can’t be fixed though, unless as Charlie says, the likes of the laser are unobtanium.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  8. #18
    Audio Al is offline Pishanto Specialist & Super-Daftee
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Dagenham Essex

    Posts: 11,215
    I'm Allen.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ali Tait View Post
    Agree with this. I’d also point out that whilst components used may be of high quality, caps are caps and resistors are resistors and as such are prone to failure after a period of time. Film caps should be fine, ‘lytics can be another matter.

    Nowt that can’t be fixed though, unless as Charlie says, the likes of the laser are unobtanium.
    A seller has these for sale
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Burmester...IAAOSw0Ppen0SC

    I think I am out as my feeling are the same as most on here , I did make a offer of what I was prepaired to pay . the offer was declined ,

    Thanks for your opinions folks

    Allen
    [

  9. #19
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Gerrards Cross

    Posts: 3,000
    I'm Tony.

    Default

    Burmester a love / hate relationship had quite a few of these over the years the 001 being the most engaging although it does look like it belongs in a drug dealer boudoir
    Coherent Systems
    Real high end sound with musicality not hifi

  10. #20
    Join Date: Jul 2009

    Location: Hampshire, UK

    Posts: 3,663
    I'm Adam.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Audio Al View Post
    Opinions please re this

    If a hifi ( CD ) player was made and first sold from 2003 and at the time was High end / cutting edge , Would that component still be HE / CE ?
    Still High End? Yes
    Still Cutting Edge? Given the technology in it is approaching 20 years old, I'd say No.

    As an aside, the whole concept of "It was good in its day but isn't any more" irritates the hell out of me. If that were the case for any piece of equipment, I'd love to know the precise date and time when it became no good any more!

    As far as I'm concerned, if something was good when new, then it still is now. Yes, it may be old-fashioned/superseded/oversized/ugly/largely worthless in monetary terms, but there's nothing to stop it still being worthy if it works properly.
    Engineers: fixing problems you didn't know you had in ways you don't understand.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •