This is one of the reasons I stick with one manufacturer and same model, As I believe manufactures invest heavily in-house and R&D on their products, Never been keen on mix and match (Which I have done plenty of in the past) for that reason.
Location: Sussex By The Sea
Posts: 352
I'm Paul.
This is one of the reasons I stick with one manufacturer and same model, As I believe manufactures invest heavily in-house and R&D on their products, Never been keen on mix and match (Which I have done plenty of in the past) for that reason.
HI-FI SYSTEM:-
Revox B250 Amp.
Revox PR 99 mk2 R2R.
Revox B126 C/D Player.
Yamaha GT2000 T/Table with Shure MKIV Cartridge and Jeco VN-45HE SAS/R Stylus.
Bang & Olufsen Beolab18's and the 19 Sub Speakers.
A/V 5.1 System :-
Soundsend Wisa box.
Harmen Kardon front and rear satellite.
Legend 10.2 Silverback Active Centre.
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 2,683
I'm Andre.
That was a good front end with the Grace.. But thats exactly what is happening. Present amp sound far worse than a CD player. Although i am putting the blame on the new amp Phono stage, The Line Level input aint up to scratch either. I know its no flashy deck, just an early 70's Jap deck but even so i know its sounds better than CD player thru the other amp.
You don’t have to spend an enormous amount on a phono stage to easily beat the performance of an average integrated amps phono stage, the only exception is if the amp’s manufacturer also makes turntables and cartridges, i.e. Rega, the phono stage in my Brio is excellent, have to admit I only auditioned it briefly with my second string deck an ATLP5 with Goldring E3 when I first got the amp as my Planar 3 in the main system has an ATF7 moving coil on it, although I’m considering an SUT or head amp so I can make use of the Brios phono stage.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Location: blackpool
Posts: 491
I'm neil.
Planar 3 in the main system has an ATF7 moving coil on it
A very much underrated Cart the ATF7 - very reasonable price great VFM - I had one long ago really enjoyed it
Sorry for being off topic
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 398
I'm David.
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 2,683
I'm Andre.
lol no its not set up correctly thats why it sounds good on one Amp.. Please read the thread. ofc its a British amp that sounds a bit cack. Should have realised that from the start.
Kevin
Too busy enjoying the music....
European loan coordinator for Graham Slee HiFi system components..
On the amp changing the sound quality with the same TT then I think you have highlighted the probable issue Andre was referring to.
I presume, maybe wrongly he was thinking a TT with a MM cartridge or I suppose possibly a MC, where the obvious change would be the onboard phono stage in the amp. From my understanding the quality and capability can vary greatly from different manufacturers so it is understandable that an amp swap may deteriorate the SQ coming from a TT, or possibly improve it. Personally I think the separate phono stage is the best option, as it enables you to swap around amps if that is what you are into and hear the impact. If you like it and the amp has its own phono stage then you can always try the TT through that as well and decide if it is better than with the independent phono stage.
Listening is the act of aural discrimination and dissemination of sound, and accepting you get it wrong sometimes.
Analog Inputs: Pro-Ject Signature 10 TT & arm, Benz Micro LP-S, Michel Cusis MC, Goldring 2500 and Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridges, Hitachi FT5500 mk2 Tuner
Digital:- Marantz SA-KI Pearl CD player, RaspberryPi/HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, Buffalo NAS Drive
Amplification:- AudioValve Sunilda phono stage, Krell KSP-7B pre-amp, Krell KSA-80 power amp
Output: Wilson Benesch Vector speakers, KLH Ultimate One Headphones
Cables: Tellurium Q Ultra Black II RCA & Chord Epic 2 RCA, various speaker leads, & links
I think I am nearing audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone.
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 2,683
I'm Andre.
I think this Topic has gone off a bit.. A bit of a refresh
Amp No.1 - Sounds great with Turntable
Amp No.2 - Sounds dreadfully dull with same turntable
What im saying is if i had Amp No.2 before No.1 i would have judged the Turntable as being crap & sold it on. But because i had amp No.1 first i know full well its the No.2 amp that is the problem not the deck.. What im trying to say is you can easily create the scenario..
Yes Andre, I do get that but however you look at it, in your amp 2 (first one owned) scenario (first one owned) it could have been the amp or TT that was the issue. IMO the only way to know is to try the amp with another TT and see if it OK, or still bad, but keeping in mind that if it that works better it just could be the cartridge/phono combination is a better match that with the other TT. Conversely you can then try your amp 1 (2nd amp scenario) with the original TT, and if it is better then you may again just have a better match.
What I was trying to get at is in my experience a simpler way is to try and limit the variables by using a recognised good external phono stage with the TT and then do direct comparisons between the amps to see which works best. If you then try the amps with the TT using their built in phono stages and one sounds crap then you know it is the inbuilt phone stage that is poor. I think that makes some sort of sense.
Listening is the act of aural discrimination and dissemination of sound, and accepting you get it wrong sometimes.
Analog Inputs: Pro-Ject Signature 10 TT & arm, Benz Micro LP-S, Michel Cusis MC, Goldring 2500 and Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridges, Hitachi FT5500 mk2 Tuner
Digital:- Marantz SA-KI Pearl CD player, RaspberryPi/HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, Buffalo NAS Drive
Amplification:- AudioValve Sunilda phono stage, Krell KSP-7B pre-amp, Krell KSA-80 power amp
Output: Wilson Benesch Vector speakers, KLH Ultimate One Headphones
Cables: Tellurium Q Ultra Black II RCA & Chord Epic 2 RCA, various speaker leads, & links
I think I am nearing audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone.