Johns Hopkins Medical Centre - World Coronavirus infection Map by Country.

[HD Goofnut]

Mail On Sunday? The paper with the photo on the front page.

Ministry Of Sound? Maybe he wants to go to a rave.

[RobbieGong]

Mail On Sunday? The paper with the photo on the front page.

Ministry Of Sound? Is he going raving?

Man off side...

[HD Goofnut]

Man off side...

I prefer to think of Borris dropping a bit of MDMA, chewing his face off and giving it a bit “big fish, little fish, cardboard box” at a illegal free party!

[Macca]

Yes, that's simply because you haven't studied the man properly, and instead have ignorantly labelled him as a 'nut', simply because you consider his views as heretical! Research him and his achievements to date and you may come to a different conclusion, although perhaps not, as your views (and biases) are very deeply ingrained.



LOL - of course you do! As does everyone.

.

You asked me to watch it and give my opinion so I did. Now it doesn't agree with yours but instead of addressing my criticisms of the video - in that it is lacking completely in data and evidence - you just dismiss my opinion as 'ingrained bias.' Do you realise how irritating that is?

Why would I take this bloke seriously in what he says when he doesn't back it up with anything?

For example he claims that the reason the death rate has been so high this year is not because of Covid but because last year the death rate was historically low and people have to die sometime. He states that as the number of older people in the population increases, the number of deaths increases (well duh) but he then claims that even with the Covid deaths factored on we are still on the same statistical trajectory as we were before the outbreak. That's a big and I think unlikely claim, but an interesting one - if it's true.

But if you want to convince rational, sceptical people of the truth of your theory you don't make a claim like that without backing it up with some facts and figures, referenced so that we can see what the sources are and how credible they are.

But there is none of that we are just supposed to accept this claim as fact. Maybe it is a fact, although I doubt it else he might actually have attempted to back it up with some credible stats. That he doesn't is telling and gives me further cause to doubt the veracity of his other statements.

[Macca]

Have a read at ZB's views on cancer: https://zachbushmd.com/blog/cancer/

Noting (in terms of him supposedly being a 'nut'):



Yeah, aside from anything else, he really sounds like a 'nut' - NOT. Whether you agree or disagree with him or not (on any given subject), however, is another question!

Marco.

He's got crap to sell, that explains a lot https://intrinsichealthseries.com/

[struth]

death rates in uk are more than twice what they should be this year on average.. thats quite a lot of deaths

[Marco]

He's got crap to sell, that explains a lot https://intrinsichealthseries.com/

In your eternally cynical mind

So he's not entitled to earn a living while carrying out his research, by selling things he think will work and be more effective than alternatives currently available? How are we going to discover if they are or not, if people don't try them? Should he simply offer them for free?

And how is that any different from the likes of Gates selling vaccines, which companies he controls has had patented? Or pharma companies in general selling us all sorts of drugs, which clearly aren't working very well, in terms of 'curing' what they're supposed to cure..

Marco.

[Marco]

death rates in uk are more than twice what they should be this year on average.. thats quite a lot of deaths

And you've automatically concluded that COVID-19 has been solely responsible? It's rather more complex that that, mate [many other underlying contributory factors], which if you watch the video I linked to you'll see.

Marco.

[Marco]

You asked me to watch it and give my opinion so I did..

No you haven't. You've admitted to only having skimmed though it, and simply dismissed the rest! So I'm afraid that doesn't entitle you to a valid opinion on the man or what he's saying, based on only having listened to a tiny part of it...

It's "lacking completely in data and evidence" because he's conducting an interview with a layperson, in an attempt to educate other laypeople in a language that they will understand! He's not conducting a lecture on medicine to fellow doctors.

So what would you expect to see, loads of graphs and scientific data that would simply go over most people's heads and send them to sleep? That would've added about another 3 hours onto the video!

If you want data and evidence, then you do some research on his stated findings (and him) after watching the video, should you consider it necessary. So watch the WHOLE VIDEO, from start to finish, then come back to me on it, or don't bother, and simply remain ignorant as to its actual content.

No-one is asking you to accept what he's saying as fact. That's entirely up to YOU, based on the judgement criteria YOU choose to apply - and in that respect don't automatically assume that yours is more 'rational' than anyone else's!

Marco.

[Marco]

Mail On Sunday? The paper with the photo on the front page.

Lol - yeah, exactly that!

Don't see why they chose to write that though, as it was simply stating the obvious, or not as the case may be! I only read/focussed on the headlines; I paid no attention to the name of the paper.

Marco.