Johns Hopkins Medical Centre - World Coronavirus infection Map by Country.

[Marco]

Well, Big Brother Watch seem sane compared to the Q-Anon loonies with their wacko theories about Donald Trump, saviour of the universe. But here in the UK at least any 'Big Brother' scheme will almost invariably be stymied by a) government incompetence, particularly in the IT field, and b) the sheer bloody-mindedness of the British populace.

I fully agree (although disagree on some aspects of the Trump thing), but the latter in particular is certainly true. The point is though, you need people in Westminster, who are very firmly focussed on protecting our civil liberties, to keep on 'poking' the authorities (as seen on the video contained on the Twitter feed I posted earlier), and in keeping the government's desire to control us in check!

I won't be fucking 'controlled' by anyone, period. I'd die fighting for my freedom first! Of course, I'll always behave reasonably and responsibly, and lawfully within certain boundaries, but that's it.

It's slightly odd, given that you support civil liberties, that you back the supposed intention of Donald Trump to close down media outlets he doesn't approve of, and lock up various people. We now see that he's trying to block publication of two books that say nasty things about him. So much for freedom of speech!

Erm no... It isn't as black and white as that. Right now, I'm backing him to do *whatever is necessary* to dismantle and bring down the global elite, and anyone who knowingly represents them or furthers their agenda, as I believe that currently, that takes precedence over all else.

Once, or if he succeeds, partially or otherwise, then I'll look into what else he represents in more detail and judge him on that accordingly.

As I've already said, before the end of his time in The White House, I fully expect him to have succeeded in putting behind bars more scum, such as Epstein, for crimes they've committed against humanity, and in exposing high-level corruption and paedophile rings, sex trafficking and slavery, which is rotting the foundations of our society.

So come back to me, once we've seen what's happened, and we'll assess things then. Btw, you do realise that if I'm proved right about ANY of this, I'll be demanding a full and sincere public apology from you, for the ribbing I've been taking?

Just so you know!!

Marco.

[Joe]

As I've already said, before the end of his time in The White House, I fully believe that he'll have succeeded in jailing more scum, such as Epstein, for crimes that they've committed against humanity, and in exposing high-level corruption, which us rotting the foundations of our society.

So come back to me, once we've seen what's happened, and we'll assess things then. Btw, you do realise that if I'm right about ANY of this, I'll be demanding a full and sincere public apology from you, for the ridicule I've been subjected to?

Just so you know!!

Marco.

Oh, sure. But if I had to put money on it, my bet would be that Trump continues to flounder around, pissing off just about everyone, and achieving fuck-all. He keeps picking fights he doesn't need (eg over curtailing the employment rights of LGBTQ workers) and losing. If he's got some master-plan in his back pocket, why is he farting around?

Trump continually does dumb things on social media, most recently by posting a 'doctored' video on Twitter, making himself look like an incompetent loser:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53106029

'Twitter has labelled a video tweeted by US President Donald Trump as having "manipulated media" for the first time.

The video shows a black child running away from a white child while playing, with a fake CNN caption.

The caption reads: "Terrified toddler runs from racist baby", before the video accuses CNN of "fake news"

CNN's communications department also tweeted back at the president with a terse response.

"CNN did cover this story - exactly as it happened. Just as we reported your positions on race (and poll numbers)," it wrote.

"We'll continue working with facts rather than tweeting fake videos that exploit innocent children. We invite you to do the same. Be better.".'

As I said upthread, the Supreme Court, even though it has a majority of politically conservative judges, seems to be in the mood to reject everything Trump is asking for, so they'll probably tell him where to shove his 'sealed indictments'.

[struth]

he will get into bed with anyone who will help him win again. it wont overly surprise me if he does too

[Joe]

he will get into bed with anyone who will help him win again. it wont overly surprise me if he does too

Much depends on whether Putin reckons Trump is still worth backing. The problem for Trump is that he's not just pissing off those who would never vote for him anyway, he's also pissing off conservatives, partly because he's not delivering on his promises, and partly because he's so obviously an idiot.

[struth]

might be Xi Jinping this time; you just never know...lol he is mad enough

[Joe]

might be Xi Jinping this time; you just never know...lol he is mad enough

He's already asked (according to John Bolton):

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53089609

'In the book, Mr Bolton describes a meeting between President Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping at a G20 meeting in Japan last year.

The US president "stunningly, turned the conversation to the coming US presidential election [in 2020], alluding to China's economic capability and pleading with Xi to ensure he'd win," Mr Bolton writes.

"He stressed the importance of farmers and increased Chinese purchases of soybeans and wheat in the electoral outcome."

Agriculture is one of the major industries in the Midwest American states that helped propel Mr Trump to victory in the 2016 election.'

[Marco]

Before I get to anything else, could you explain what you mean and/or have heard about his sealed indictments? Any links you can provide would help

As I said upthread, the Supreme Court, even though it has a majority of politically conservative judges, seems to be in the mood to reject everything Trump is asking for, so they'll probably tell him where to shove his 'sealed indictments'.

Marco.

[struth]

think there was talk about charges for trump, but as he is sitting president cant currently be charged, so seal indictment in an envelope and open it again when he isnt pres

[Marco]

Yes but if you read what Joe's written (let's look at it again):

As I said upthread, the Supreme Court, even though it has a majority of politically conservative judges, seems to be in the mood to reject everything Trump is asking for, so they'll probably tell him where to shove his 'sealed indictments'.

So... In the mood for rejecting everything that TRUMP IS ASKING FOR, not what others are asking should be happening to him. Therefore, I read that as Trump having initiated sealed indictments against others, hence why he's (apparently) being told where to shove them.

That's why I've asked Joe to explain, and also reveal his source.

Marco.

[struth]

must be the Epstein ones then i guess.