Yes, but it wasn't because I didn't think that bit was relevant, simply (as I've said) that the main point, as far as I was concerned, and based on the argument I was presenting, was the fact it wasn't 100% effective, not why.
My point is this:
People still die from flu every year *despite* having been vaccinated for it, and that's simply because the vaccine they've received won't have been 100% effective.
Therefore, if it's only, say, 70% effective, then the 30% of ineffectiveness WILL unquestionably have an impact on the mortality rates of those who've been vaccinated, but still get flu, and unfortunately succumb to a fatal reaction from it.
And in that respect, the forthcoming vaccines for Covid are unlikely to be any different.
Marco.