Originally Posted by
Marco
Therefore, I do believe that there will be a continued focus from the government on getting more and more people 'jabbed', whether it be boosters or otherwise, simply to continue making money for the pharma companies, ultimately pulling their strings and controlling the agenda, and so half-truths or blatant lies will continue to be used in order to skew the public health figures, in whatever way best facilitates that agenda (possibly such as you've outlined) - but not to drive a lockdown.
Marco.
Comparing this to post #9197 (sorry I can't put both quotes into one post), I can't tell if you think the government is trying line the pockets of big pharma, and if so, how? It's all getting a bit confusing.
And this is addressed to no one in particular: Is it just possible that if the government ditched the idea of vaccines and pushed everyone down the Ivermectin route, there would be similar resistance and suspicion? Just sayin...
And I was one of the "few" who got the Pfizer jab, maybe somebody decided i was worth spending money on
I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in
T/T: Inspire Monarch, X200 tonearm, Ortofon Quintet Blue. Phono: Project Tube Box CD: Marantz CD6006 (UK Edition); Amp: Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated.
Speakers: Zu Omen Def, REL T9i subwoofer. Cables: Atlas Equator interconnects, Atlas Hyper 3.0 speaker cables
T'other system:
Echo Dot, Amptastic Mini One,Arcam A75 integrated, Celestion 5's, BK XLS-200 DF
A/V:
LG 55" OLED, Panasonic Blu Ray, Sony a/v amp, MA Radius speakers, REL Storm sub
Forget the past, it's gone. And don't worry about the future, it doesn't exist. There is only NOW.
KICKSTARTER: ENABLING SCAMMERS SINCE 2009