Johns Hopkins Medical Centre - World Coronavirus infection Map by Country.

[Marco]

Here are more of Silkie's erudite protestations on Twitter, which are very much worth reading: https://twitter.com/silkiecarlo/stat...84397078114304

Marco.

[Joe]

But wait! Aren't Scotland's lockdown laws even tougher than England's? Is Nicola Sturgeon part of the plot, or an unwitting pawn?

[Marco]

The latter, as indeed I (reluctantly suspect, because I can't stand the c*nt) BJ is.

However it's yet another example (even WORSE than the Poll Tax) of how Scotland's acted as the guinea pig for 'testing out' an ENGLISH Westminster government's unjust and inhumane political policies!

And you wonder why we want independence?? !!

Marco.

[Joe]

The latter, as indeed I (reluctantly suspect, because I can't stand the c*nt) BJ is.

However it's yet another example (even WORSE than the Poll Tax) of how Scotland's acted as the guinea pig for 'testing out' an ENGLISH Westminster government's unjust and inhumane political policies!

And you wonder why we want independence?? !!

Marco.

But surely England's aiming to move out of lockdown sooner than Scotland (eg by re-opening primary schools). Are you saying Scotland is wrong not follow suit? As I understand it, each UK nation sets its own rules on lockdown.

[Marco]

Anyway, have you watched the video yet?

I'd like your views [shown near the end] specifically on the amendments, as a result of new Coronavirus Regulations, which have been carried out to the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, such as the "Power to order health measures in relation to persons"?

There's some very dangerous shit in there, which the government could easily use COVID-19 as an excuse to implement, and which would subsequently, effectively remove all of our human rights!!

Marco.

[Marco]

But surely England's aiming to move out of lockdown sooner than Scotland (eg by re-opening primary schools). Are you saying Scotland is wrong not follow suit? As I understand it, each UK nation sets its own rules on lockdown.

No, what I'm saying is that they're using some of the measures that they're intending on introducing in England, in Scotland first to test it and monitor the outcome.

If you watch the video, which you really need to get off your arse and do, so that we're 'singing from the same hymn sheet', as it were, you'll see the Scottish chap with the beard (I think his name was David) discussing it near the end.

So..... Please refrain from posting on this thread again until you've watched the video! Ta

Marco.

[Marco]

In the meantime, here's another very important video to watch, which shows what they're up against in the States, and no doubt would have implications here, if FUCKERS like this are successful:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDC_...ature=youtu.be



Marco.

[Joe]

No, what I'm saying is that they're using some of the measures that they're intending on introducing in England, in Scotland first to test it and monitor the outcome.

If you watch the video, which you really need to get off your arse and do, so that we're 'singing from the same hymn sheet', as it were, you'll see the Scottish chap with the beard (I think his name was David) discussing it near the end.

So..... Please refrain from posting on this thread again until you've watched the video! Ta

Marco.

Well, I watched it. What it seemed to me the Scottish bloke was saying was that the SNP had, post-devolution, developed a system of government that England is now copying, which suggests that Salmond/Sturgeon must be implicated rather than innocent bystanders.

I also detected some anti-semitic nuances; eg in the defence of David Irving towards the end. Otherwise, it was confused and poorly presented, and unconvincing. But at least I watched it!

[Gazjam]

@Joe

Latest Scottish lockdown guidelines here mate.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-52757732

[Marco]

Well, I watched it. What it seemed to me the Scottish bloke was saying was that the SNP had, post-devolution, developed a system of government that England is now copying, which suggests that Salmond/Sturgeon must be implicated rather than innocent bystanders.

I also detected some anti-semitic nuances; eg in the defence of David Irving towards the end. Otherwise, it was confused and poorly presented, and unconvincing. But at least I watched it!

Yes, but who behind the scenes might have been pulling the strings of Salmond or Sturgeon and controlling the agenda? Trust me, that happens all the time in politics (and elsewhere) and touches upon what I was discussing with you earlier, about people being surreptitiously manipulated and controlled by, let's call them, 'higher powers'.

Johnson's having his strings pulled too, by others (such as his advisors and superiors, and the 'powers that be' above them). This is no new thing in politics. All these people are simply figureheads, appointed to push through an agenda for those who ultimately are in control! That's how the system works.

Anyway, your views of the video are not unexpected, as given how accustomed I'm becoming to how your mind appears to work, I'd have been very surprised if you'd reached any other conclusion

Could I ask you then how "confused" you found the following:

I'd like your views [shown near the end of the video] specifically on the amendments, as a result of new Coronavirus Regulations, which have been carried out to the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, such as the "Power to order health measures in relation to persons"?

There's some very dangerous shit listed there, which the government could easily use COVID-19 as an excuse to implement, and which would subsequently, effectively remove all of our human rights!!

If you can't see that, then well, I really don't know what to say.........

Marco.