I agree, so why has such extreme action been taken this time - what justification is there for it now that wasn't deemed necessary before? As you say, influenza (and pneumonia) has killed, and will continue to kill in future, far more people than Covid-19 has or ever will, so WHY have we never shut down the whole country in an attempt to control or 'fix' that?
Well, as far as I'm concerned the bat thing is simply a plausible explanation, but no more than that. I've yet to see any conclusive proof showing that's where it started. It's not the virus itself that has a 'purpose', but possibly the authorities using it as an excuse to impose more levels of control on the population, as governments often seek to do, simply because it makes their job easier.
100% agree, so why are we using bad science instead, which is promoting the nonsensical prospect of a 'huge second wave' this winter, to drive all the important decisions we're taking to run the country (many of them, as you've said, which have so far proven disastrous, as the data clearly shows that lockdowns have NOT flattened the curve), when the good science, as shown in the video, clearly indicates a very likely different scenario?
And, most importantly, why is the good science being hidden away, or not recognised and discussed on mainstream TV, and given the appropriate coverage? And this is the important bit...
If there was no nefarious agenda (or existence of sheer government incompetence), and the science/data shown in the video was indisputably correct, then surely that would be a reason to CELEBRATE the fact that the real epidemic is over (was over in May), and that the only reason the case numbers are skyrocketing is because of all the stupid bloody testing?
Then we can all embrace and accept that fact, protect the most vulnerable, by shielding them appropriately, and let the rest of us get back to living our bloody lives as normal, and building up herd immunity?? You can't rule the whole country (or the world) based on what might happen to a tiny percentage of the population because of a virus - you have to rule it based on what will almost certainly happen with the VAST majority who will survive it!
What's your answer to that? It's just UTTERLY BONKERS what's currently happening, and the threat of another national lockdown, based on what - self-inflicted rising cases, which if the correct data is analysed, are easily explainable??
We need to end this 'casedemic hysteria' now, before it leads to the making of even more disastrous decisions!
Indeed, but will it be? It certainly doesn't look like it!!
So who do we blame, if things continue as they are, and it all goes tits up? BJ-boy and his hapless cronies [and dimwit scientific advisors], that's who!
So why are they continuing to listen to the WRONG experts, who clearly aren't able to analyse the data correctly (or perhaps are deliberately doing so for reasons we don't yet know) - the same ones who produced a model for the outcome of the epidemic that was
grossly inaccurate - why aren't they being guided instead by the scientists who collated the data shown on that video? If they were, we wouldn't be in this mess now!
Yes, but only when the "hard data" examined is correct, otherwise you'll never get to the truth. The whole thing is an absolute and disgraceful shambles, with likely fatal and irreversible consequences.
Marco.