+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: CD Vs LP (Yes, I know!)

  1. #11
    Audio Al is offline Pishanto Specialist & Super-Daftee
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Dagenham Essex

    Posts: 11,215
    I'm Allen.

    Default

    My opinion is that CD stands for compromised disc ,

    All hi frequency cut and low as well ,

    Then whats left gets compressed

    Then you hear whats left

    Vinyl well what can I say other than I love it
    [

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cheltenham

    Posts: 982
    I'm Charlie.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJo View Post
    What would be the dynamic range of a piece like this Charlie and how would that compare to a compressed track?
    I’ve always listened to guitar based music (rock, blues, jazz, c/w) but more recently been to a few classical concerts and the sudden jump in volume at times has been a shock at these performances.
    JohnJo,

    The loudness-war website has a huge database about sound quality, dynamic range and compression - this shows the dynamic range for the average, worst and best tracks on the album.

    Here are the data for the MJ album I posted

    http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...m=off+the+wall


    Here are the data for Toto
    http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...oto&album=toto
    R2R: Studer A820 1/2 inch 2 track; Otari MTR-12 1/4 inch 2 track; Sony APR 5003; Sony APR 5002; Studer A807/II. Vinyl: Platine Verdier Allaerts MC1B/Schroeder Reference & Model 2 Decca C4E/Hadcock 228 TRON Seven Reference phono. Keith Monks MkII RCM Other analogue source: Nakamichi Dragon with ANT4066 mods. Amplification: TRON Meteor preamp TRON Voyager 20B SET power. Speakers: Avantgarde Duo. Digital: computing at last with Prism Sound Lyra 2 A2D converter

  3. #13
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,925
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    All listed CD versions of TOTO IV have a good dynamic range so 'loudness wars' compression is not the issue here http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...=toto&album=IV

    The CD player is far from the best, likewise the amplifier. Good amplification is essential to get the best from digital.

    I have about 50 or so albums on both vinyl and CD. Only in a handful of cases does the vinyl sound 'better. But is true some CD transfers of older recordings are quite poor.

    Try a CD of a quality modern digital production, if it still sounds poor then look at the amp and player.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Sep 2014

    Location: Northern Ireland

    Posts: 1,403
    I'm John.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by topoxforddoc View Post
    JohnJo,

    The loudness-war website has a huge database about sound quality, dynamic range and compression - this shows the dynamic range for the average, worst and best tracks on the album.

    Here are the data for the MJ album I posted

    http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...m=off+the+wall


    Here are the data for Toto
    http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...oto&album=toto
    Thanks Charlie, very interesting site.

    I’ll get a look later.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Oct 2011

    Location: Bacup

    Posts: 502
    I'm Andrew.

    Default

    wasn't the TOTO mentioned in the original post referring to Yes' Tales Of Topographic Oceans?

  6. #16
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,925
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RMutt View Post
    wasn't the TOTO mentioned in the original post referring to Yes' Tales Of Topographic Oceans?
    Good point, But it's 'Tales From Topographic Oceans'. There are some poor DR releases of that, the SACD, the HDCD and the Japanese version. Funny how the 'audiophile' formats have the worst quality. Not the one the op has though. http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...GRAPHIC+OCEANS
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Oct 2011

    Location: Bacup

    Posts: 502
    I'm Andrew.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    Good point, But it's 'Tales From Topographic Oceans'. There are some poor DR releases of that, the SACD, the HDCD and the Japanese version. Funny how the 'audiophile' formats have the worst quality. Not the one the op has though. http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...GRAPHIC+OCEANS
    Ahh, I stand corrected. Yes not massively on my radar.

  8. #18
    Alex_UK's Avatar
    Alex_UK is offline Spotify + Facebook Moderator / Chilled-Out Wino and only here for the shilling
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Sunny Suffolk, UK

    Posts: 15,952
    I'm WrappingALilacCurtainAroundMyBobby.

    Default

    There's a "Master" of the (correct Yes album) on Tidal, as well as a 2003 remaster - do you have access to Tidal, Peter? Might be another interesting comparison. (Not really my sort of music, but the Master version sounds very good through my current relatively modest setup.)
    Alex

    Main System: Digital: HP Laptop/M2Tech Hiface/Logitech Media Server/FLAC; Marantz SA7001 KI Signature SACD Player and other digital stuff into Gatorised Beresford Caiman DAC Vinyl: Garrard 401/SME 3009 SII Improved/Sumiko HS/Nagaoka MP-30
    Amplifier: Rega Brio R. Speakers: Spendor SP1. Cables: Various, mainly Mark Grant.
    Please see "about me" for the rest of my cr@p! Gallery


    A.o.S. on Facebook - A.o.S. on Spotify - A.o.S. on Twitter

    There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing and be nothing Aristotle

  9. #19
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: North Down /Northern Ireland/ UK

    Posts: 19,484
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    The Ocean View Digital Yes remasters are awful, no dynamics, compressed and distortion, complete and utter crap.
    Regards Neil

  10. #20
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Hmm, very difficult to get a superb version of a classic album these days. I bought a re-issue of Pink Floyd's The Wall a year or so back and it is dire. Flat, muffled and completely strangled. The last CD I bought though was Shpongle's Codex VI and it is sublime. Modern, digital and sublime without any of vinyl's seriously compromised low frequencies. Bloody lovely album; music and production.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •