+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: BBC LS3/5a

  1. #1
    Join Date: Mar 2018

    Location: Battle, East Sussex

    Posts: 162
    I'm Lee.

    Default BBC LS3/5a

    Hi guys,

    What’s the view and experience on the
    LS3/5a?

    Have many people used them or still use them?

    There seems to be a bit of a cult following and sh prices are steep.

    Should they be on my bucket list?

    Is it fools gold

    Thanks
    It’s about the music
    70s Retro Yamaha YP800TT, CA1000Mk2, CT1010

  2. #2
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Moved to frozen north, beyond Inverness

    Posts: 2,602
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eldarvanyar View Post
    Hi guys,

    What’s the view and experience on the
    LS3/5a?

    Have many people used them or still use them?

    There seems to be a bit of a cult following and sh prices are steep.

    Should they be on my bucket list?

    Is it fools gold

    Thanks
    Simple answer - I don't know.

    However, I have heard them a few times. Once was at a show, and they were on top of much larger speakers. The sound was excellent. I thought they were additions to the speakers below them, but was then told that the lower speakers were in fact switched off.

    I also heard them in a demo room - still very impressive, but when sub-woofers were added in the results were stunning.

    This was all a long time ago - more than 40 years.

    I really don't know how well they'd work in a domestic environment, and also if good implementations are still available, or if the second hand ones which are available would be a good thing to have.

    I suppose it's still possible to make them - weren't the designs published?
    Dave

  3. #3
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: N E Kent

    Posts: 51,625
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave2010 View Post
    I suppose it's still possible to make them - weren't the designs published?
    This may be of interest.

    http://www.the-ear.net/how-to/build-authentic-ls35a

    https://www.falconacoustics.co.uk/bbc-ls3-5a.html
    It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!

  4. #4
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Seaford UK

    Posts: 1,861
    I'm Dennis.

    Default

    They have a cult following, due largely to the great impact they had at the time of their introduction which was because they were very good at what they did, they were designed for was monitoring of speech in an OB van, which they did rather well, and were small. They raised the profile of BBC loudspeaker design further, and this took on a life of its own.

    However they are of limited range at both the top and bottom ends, and have a fairly serious coloration around 1k., but because of their limited range they have a pleasing presence, which many narrow band speakers can have; even a mobile phone can produce pleasant sounds. Broad band speakers have a great challenge in producing low bass without sounding poor on voice.

    They are an icon of the BBC's great days, hence the high prices IMO.

  5. #5
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: Middlesex, UK

    Posts: 4,482
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    Interesting, thank you.

    Strange, the Perspex front baffle ones, obviously not to spec. but probably for display purposes.
    Spendorman

  6. #6
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Near Saffron Walden, Essex

    Posts: 7,090
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Back in the day, they were designed to reproduce speech in a broadcast van or very small room and they did a good job of that but for music, even back then, there were better speakers to be had. We always had a pair of Spendor LS3/5A ready for demonstration but they rarely sold.

    I have heard several of the latest 'BBC inspired' LS3/5A and they have too many limitations for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date: Jan 2020

    Location: South Yorkshire

    Posts: 2,683
    I'm Andre.

    Default

    Cos it was never intended for full range Hi-Fi use, so technically there is no design limitations..

  8. #8
    Join Date: May 2017

    Location: Glasgow

    Posts: 231
    I'm Rohan.

    Default

    It's a speaker that just sounds "right" to a lot of people even now.
    I think the prices are silly, frankly.
    Bettered by near-contemporary KEF 101, same drivers, similar compact size, less coloured, more even frequency response in the upper bass, less money to pick a pair up.

  9. #9
    Join Date: Jan 2020

    Location: South Yorkshire

    Posts: 2,683
    I'm Andre.

    Default

    Much much prefered the Jim Rogers '149'

  10. #10
    Join Date: May 2017

    Location: Glasgow

    Posts: 231
    I'm Rohan.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Made in 1968 View Post
    Much much prefered the Jim Rogers '149'
    That's another classic from that time, definitely. And again much more reasonably priced.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •