Well, no - in the context of the sentence it meant constrained dynamics, viz. a glass ceiling affecting the dynamics.
I'm fine with veils being lifted, as well.
Come on, we've all heard that happen. So why not say so?
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Well, no - in the context of the sentence it meant constrained dynamics, viz. a glass ceiling affecting the dynamics.
I'm fine with veils being lifted, as well.
Come on, we've all heard that happen. So why not say so?
.
Location: Dagenham Essex
Posts: 11,215
I'm Allen.
Location: Dagenham Essex
Posts: 11,215
I'm Allen.
Also where do they put the veils to start with , If the sound is much better without them I will remove mine
Please advise
[
OK here is my review of my speakers and how they sound in my system.
"The music washes over you in waves of euphoric glory, the bass content is tight and controlled pumping rhythmically, the mid-range is awash with sweet tones of purity and the clarity leaving you spellbound, the high notes and top end content are as high as I have ever heard them, pushing the boundaries of sonic sensibility. A most musically orgasmic experience to be experienced carefully."
Listening is the act of aural discrimination and dissemination of sound, and accepting you get it wrong sometimes.
Analog Inputs: Pro-Ject Signature 10 TT & arm, Benz Micro LP-S, Michel Cusis MC, Goldring 2500 and Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridges, Hitachi FT5500 mk2 Tuner
Digital:- Marantz SA-KI Pearl CD player, RaspberryPi/HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, Buffalo NAS Drive
Amplification:- AudioValve Sunilda phono stage, Krell KSP-7B pre-amp, Krell KSA-80 power amp
Output: Wilson Benesch Vector speakers, KLH Ultimate One Headphones
Cables: Tellurium Q Ultra Black II RCA & Chord Epic 2 RCA, various speaker leads, & links
I think I am nearing audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone.
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
I'd keep the day job if I were you.
.
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
You forgot to include " I think I am at audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone"
.
Location: London
Posts: 313
I'm David.
Listening is the act of aural discrimination and dissemination of sound, and accepting you get it wrong sometimes.
Analog Inputs: Pro-Ject Signature 10 TT & arm, Benz Micro LP-S, Michel Cusis MC, Goldring 2500 and Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridges, Hitachi FT5500 mk2 Tuner
Digital:- Marantz SA-KI Pearl CD player, RaspberryPi/HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, Buffalo NAS Drive
Amplification:- AudioValve Sunilda phono stage, Krell KSP-7B pre-amp, Krell KSA-80 power amp
Output: Wilson Benesch Vector speakers, KLH Ultimate One Headphones
Cables: Tellurium Q Ultra Black II RCA & Chord Epic 2 RCA, various speaker leads, & links
I think I am nearing audio nirvana, but don’t tell anyone.
I wonder if contentious reviews qualify as 'fake news'?
It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!
I stopped buying the audio mags years ago, as I found the reviews were not critical enough - nearly everything reviewed was wonderful, 'state of the art', etc., with an increasingly florid language being used. Some of the worse were/are the reviews written by Ken Kessler in HFN. Enthusiasm aside, Kessler's use of analogies with other high quality products, such as wristwatches, wine, shoes, fountain pens and leather goods, are largely irrelevant and unhelpful.
Describing in words how an item of audio gear sounds is as difficult as describing how a dish tastes in a restaurant review, or how a wine tastes, so is not an easy task. That is the problem when discussing the subjective aspects of a product. Occasionally a reviewer may use a turn of phrase which will resonate with the reader, but most of the time it is often just a lot of waffle.
But reviewing an item and giving it a bad review doesn't sell many copies.
Barry